Perlindungan Hukum Pengguna Mobile Banking Sebagai Korban Kejahatan Melalui Internet Ditinjau Dari Hukum Positif
Main Article Content
Abstract
Information technology can be used to commit a wide variety of crimes, including online gambling, automated teller machine theft, corporate data theft, and fraud through electronic media. As victims of fraud crimes often lack access to legal assistance and receive little attention from the criminal justice system as a whole - especially in terms of human rights - laws are therefore needed to control them. The author concludes that Article 28 paragraph (1) of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law and Article 378 of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law regulate in terms of positive law regarding the legal protection of mobile banking users as victims of internet crimes. Article 378 of the Criminal Code, which provides legal protection to consumers of M-Banking users against potential losses, is evident in the Law on the protection of witnesses and victims, a special regulation relating to the protection of victims. Even so, witness and victim protection laws offer protection to victims from illegal activities that place witnesses and victims in dangerous situations that could endanger their lives. Electronic information and technology laws offer protection to suspects and defendants through case resolution and criminal sanctions; in contrast, the criminal procedure code protects victims through the right to report, the right to organize public prosecutors, and the right to combine criminal and civil prosecutions to obtain compensation.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.
References
Ronny Haniatjo Soemitro, Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Jurumetri, PT Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1990.
Soerjono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 1984.
Asril Sitompul, Hukum Internet Pengenalan Mengenai Masalah Hukum di Cyberspace, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2001.
Nandang Sambas, Dian Andriasari, Kriminologi Perspektif hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafik, Jakarta, 2019.
Aldo Sonjaya, Dian Alan Setiawan, Perlindungan Hukum bagi Korban Kebocoran Data Pribadi Pengguna Aplikasi Tokopedia berdasarkan UU No. 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas UU No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi, Jurnal Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Lash, Nicholas A. Banking Laws and Rgulation: an Economic Perspective, (USA Prentice Hall Inc, 1987, hal. 8). dalam Hikmahanto Juwana, Analisa Hukum atas hukum Perbankan, dalam Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan no 1-3, tahun XXVIII, (Jakarta: 1998, UI), hlm. 88