ANALYSIS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF COURT DECISIONS ON CUSTOMARY LAND DISPUTES IN INDONESIA

Article Sidebar

ARTICLE PDF
Published: Jul 17, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.708
Keywords:
Customary Land Disputes, Court Decisions, Execution Of Decisions, Indigenous Peoples, Agrarian Conflicts

Main Article Content

Nur Rijal
Universitas Al-Azhar, Indonesia
Fokky Fuad
Al-Azhar University, Indonesia
Anis Rifai
Al-Azhar University, Indonesia

Abstract

Customary land is one of the sources of agrarian conflicts that often occur in Indonesia. The government has attempted to resolve land disputes by involving the judiciary. However, the implementation of court decisions often does not meet the expectations of indigenous peoples, so the conflict continues. This study aims to analyze the implementation of court decisions on customary land claims in Indonesia. The method used is normative legal research with a case approach. This study uses secondary data from court decisions and related documents. The results of the research show that the implementation of court decisions on customary land disputes in Indonesia still faces various obstacles. Some of these obstacles include the ignorance of indigenous peoples about court decisions, the slow execution of decisions, and the lack of support from the government in enforcing court decisions. This study recommends the need for efforts to increase awareness of indigenous peoples regarding court decisions, accelerate the execution of decisions, and increase support from the government in enforcing court decisions. In addition, there is a need to formulate clear and firm regulations regarding the implementation of court decisions on customary land disputes in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rijal, N., Fuad, F., & Rifai, A. (2023). ANALYSIS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF COURT DECISIONS ON CUSTOMARY LAND DISPUTES IN INDONESIA. UNES Law Review, 5(4), 3999-4008. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.708
Issue
Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Hak cipta :

Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:

  1. Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
  2. Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
  3. Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.

References

Abdulkadir, M. (2020). Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Febrianti, N. (2013). Bisma Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen Volume 6 No. 1 Agustus, 13(1), 43–51.
Jonathan Sarwono. (2016). Meode Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif. Graha Ilmu.
Khalid, A. (2014). Penafsiran Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia. Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum, 6(11). Https://Doi.Org/10.31602/Al-Adl.V6i11.196
Lexy J. Moleong. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2018.
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria, 33 (21 C.E.).
Peraturan Menteri Agraria Nomor 2 Tahun 1960 Tentang Pelaksanaan Ketentuan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria., 67 (1960).
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 10 Tahun 1961 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah, 99 (1961).
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah, 38 (1997).
Salim. (2016). Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatf. Ciptapustaka Media.
Salim. (2017). Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan Di Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Perkasa.
Soeroso, R. (2006). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D.