Analisis Efektivitas Penerapan Hukum Pidana Dalam Pengawasan Tindak Pidana di Indonesia

Main Article Content

Khairani Khairani
Suhendar Suhendar
Mohamad Ali Syaifudin
Ali Imron
Rahmida Erliyani

Abstract

Human trafficking is a serious crime that involves the exploitation of individuals The threat of imprisonment is a dominant feature of the Indonesian Criminal Code. Although imprisonment is a common punishment in most countries, its effectiveness has been a topic of debate for centuries. Therefore, it is imperative to identify alternative forms of custodial punishment to mitigate the negative consequences of imprisonment. This research utilizes a descriptive qualitative approach to provide a comprehensive overview of the current issues based on existing evidence. The results of this research revealed several key insights. The fundamental purpose of criminal supervision in the Indonesian criminal justice system is to protect the public from criminal acts in accordance with the principles of criminal law. The Draft National Criminal Code explains that supervision punishment is an alternative to imprisonment. Supervision punishment is an alternative form of punishment with the provision that the punishment imposed will not be implemented if the conditions are met, with a maximum probation period of three years. It is evident that conditional punishment as an alternative to deprivation of liberty punishment in the existing Criminal Code is inadequate in protecting individuals and criminal offenders. Therefore, the National Criminal Code must evolve to include alternative formulations, such as supervision punishment (probation), which has been successfully developed and implemented in various countries around the world. The fundamental purpose of supervision punishment is to replace deprivation of liberty/imprisonment, an approach that has resulted in poor outcomes for both the convicted person and society at large. Therefore, supervision punishment should be included as the main type of punishment in the upcoming National Criminal Code, serving as an effective and humane alternative to deprivation of liberty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Khairani, K., Suhendar, S., Mohamad Ali Syaifudin, Ali Imron, & Rahmida Erliyani. (2024). Analisis Efektivitas Penerapan Hukum Pidana Dalam Pengawasan Tindak Pidana di Indonesia. UNES Law Review, 6(4), 12369-12376. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2246
Section
Articles

References

Ali, M. (2018). PROPORSIONALITAS DALAM KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI SANKSI PIDANA. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 25(1), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss1.art7
Arief, B. N. (2021). Beberapa aspek pengembangan ilmu hukum pidana: menyongsong generasi baru hukum pidana Indonesia. Badan Penerbit, Universitas Diponegoro.
Arif Setiawan, M. (2022). Arrest and Detention in Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code under Human Rights Perspective. International Journal of Social Science, Education, Communication and Economics (SINOMICS JOURNAL), 1(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.54443/sj.v1i2.15
Butt, S. (2012). Corruption and Law in Indonesia. Routledge.
Buzescu, G. (2024). Technical supervision in criminal proceedings. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 56, 121–138. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v56i1.10749
Ginting, J., & Yuspin, W. (2022). Comparison of Several Criminal Law Provisions Between the Indonesian Criminal Code and the Criminal Code of Other Countries: A Brief Overview290Comparison of Several Criminal Law Provisions Between the Indonesian Criminal Code and the Criminal Code of Oth. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(10), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v5i10.593
Herlin Hastuti. (2023). Implementasi Penerapan Pidana Bersyarat dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 1(2), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v1i2.273
Koesoemo, A. T., Taroreh, V. F., & Sambali, S. (2023). Benefits of Collaboration Between the Corruption Eradication Commission of the Republic of Indonesia and Higher Education Institutions in Monitoring Corruption Crime Trials for Higher Education Institutions and Courts. Journal La Sociale, 4(5), 395–401. https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v4i5.991
Kurniawan, K. D., Fajrin, Y. A., & Ishwara, A. S. S. (2024). The Synergy of Customary Criminal Law and National Criminal Law: Orientation Towards Criminal Law Pluralism. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 22(3), 552. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i3.3358
Marzuki, A. U. (2023). THE CRIMINAL LAW SYSTEM IN INDONESIA FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF PANCASILA. Journal of Social Research, 2(9), 3154–3161. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i9.1345
Munandar, M. A. (2023). CONSTRUCTION OF ABORTION CRIMINAL PROVISIONS IN THE REFORM OF THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL CODE. Awang Long Law Review, 6(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v6i1.800
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum dan Masyarakat. Angkasa.
Santoso, T. (2014). Penegakan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia: Masalah dan Solusinya. Rajawali Pers.
Shodiq, M., & Yuwannita, L. (2024). Criminal Law Policy (Penal Policy) in the Formulation of Criminal Sanctions Against Narcotics Crimes in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 7(04). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i04-60
Sutrisno, S. (2021). Pre-Trial in the Criminal Justice System in Military Criminal Judges in Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Social Science Research, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.47742/ijbssr.v2n11p1