Penetapan Honorarium Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta di Kota Pariaman

Main Article Content

Raji Saputra
Azmi Fendri
Delfiyanti Delfiyanti

Abstract

The violation of the Code of Ethics that occurred in Pariman City was caused by the Notary's actions which were not in accordance with the Regulations on the Notary's Office and the Notary's Code of Ethics. Meanwhile, the violation of the Code of Ethics in Pariaman City was the determination of the Notary's Honorarium which was below the stipulated standards. determine the UUJN and the Notary's Code of Ethics, with this the Notary concerned has violated article 36 UUJN No. 2 of 2014 and the Notary's Code of Ethics in article 4 paragraph 10. Implementation of determining the Notary's honorarium in making deeds in the city of Pariaman. The honorarium received by Notaries in Pariaman was a violation of the Code of Ethics which violated Article 4 paragraph 10 of the 2015 Notary Code of Ethics. according to its authority. Up to Rp. 100,000,000.00 the maximum honorarium received is 2.5%, then above Rp. 100,000,000.00 - Rp. 1,000,000,000.00 one billion the maximum honorarium received is 1.5%, above Rp. 000,000,000.00 honorarium received is based on an agreement between the Notary and the parties, but does not exceed 1% according to the object for which the deed is made. The honorarium received by Notaries in Pariaman was a violation of the Code of Ethics which violated Article 4 paragraph 10 of the 2015 Notary Code of Ethics which resulted in the Notary concerned committing a violation, for several reasons, namely because the client was incapable and there was a mutually acquainted relationship between the client and the Notary concerned. Supervision by the Notary organization in determining the Notary's honorarium in connection with the making of deeds in the city of Pariaman. Supervision from the Indonesian Notary Association (I.N.I) on the behavior and actions of Notaries in Pariaman so that unhealthy competition does not arise through the determination of Notary Supervision to differentiate between the behavior and actions carried out by Notaries in carrying out their positions by the Supervisory Council.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Saputra, R., Fendri, A., & Delfiyanti, D. (2023). Penetapan Honorarium Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta di Kota Pariaman. UNES Law Review, 6(1), 2905-2921. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1088
Section
Articles

References

Hartanti Sulihandari & Nisya Rifiani, Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Profesi Notaris Berdasarkan Peraturan perundang-Undangan Terbaru, Dunia Cerdas, Jakarta.
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris
Amriaty, Nurul. "Penegakan Hukum atas Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris Yang Memberikan Teguran Tertulis Kepada Notaris" Jurnal Suara Hukum 4.1 (2022): 62-85.
Undang-Undang Tentang Jabatan Notaris, UU No. 30 tahun 2004, LN No.117 Tahun 2004, TLN No.4432. ps. 16 huruf a.
Habib Adjie (2009), Sanksi Perdata Dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik, Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2009.
Haryati, Felisa. "Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris Terkait Persaingan Tidak Sehat Sesama Rekan Notaris Ditinjau Dari Peraturan Kode Etik Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (Ini)”." Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist 3.1 (2018): 74-88.
Undang-Undang Tentang Larangan Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, UU No. 5 tahun 1999, LN No.33 Tahun 1999 , TLN No.3817. ps. 1 huruf f
Gunawan, I. Ketut Adi, I. Nyoman Sumardika, and Ida Ayu Putu Widiati. "Penetapan Honorarium Notaris dalam Praktik Pelaksanaan Jabatan Notaris" Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum 1.2 (2020): 369-373.
Irwansyah dan Ahsan Yunus, (2021), Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel, Cet. 4, Mirra Buana Media, Yogyakarta.
Soerjono Soekanto,(1986), Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, UI Press, Jakarta.
E. Sumaryono, Etika Profesi Hukum, (Norma-Norma Bagi Penegak Hukum), Kanisius, Yogyakarta,2003.
Yunita Laytno, Sinkronisasi Pengaturan Honorarium Jasa Notaris antara UUJN dengan Kode Etik Notaris Acta Comitas,2019, 4(1), 22–33.
Ningsih, A., Faisal, & Adwani., Kedudukan Notaris sebagai Mediator Sengketa Kenotariatan Terkait dengan Kewajiban Penyuluhan Hukum. Mimbar Hukum, 2019, 27(1), 15–28.
Prasetiyo, A. (2017). Kewajiban Notaris dalam Menjalankan Prinsip Tata Kelola Kantor Notaris Jurnal Akta, 4(3), 441–448.
Soerjono Soekanto, (1983), Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, UI Pres, Jakarta.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>