ACTUALIZATION OF LEGAL PHILOSOPHY IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDONESIA
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the actualization of legal philosophy in the criminal justice system and review critical theory in efforts to deal with crime in society. Legal philosophy has an important role in shaping the basics of legal thinking and directing the development of an effective criminal justice system. Meanwhile, critical theory provides a critical view of the existing legal system and highlights social, economic, and political aspects that influence crime prevention. This research uses a descriptive-analytical research method by reviewing the relevant literature and literature. The analysis is carried out by studying the concepts of legal philosophy in the context of criminal justice, as well as analyzing critical theoretical reviews of the legal system and efforts to deal with crime in society. The results of the research show that the actualization of legal philosophy in the criminal justice system is important for ensuring justice and protecting individual rights. Principles such as the presumption of innocence, legal certainty and proportionality of punishment form the basis for carrying out the functions of criminal justice. In addition, a critical theory review highlights the importance of understanding the social, economic, and political factors that are at the root of crime problems. Crime prevention efforts need to involve a holistic approach that goes beyond mere criminal proceedings, involving rehabilitation programs, community empowerment, and increasing legal awareness.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.
References
Atmasasmita, Romli. 1996. Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Perspektif Eksistensialisme dan Abolisionalisme. Bandung: Binacipta.
Ben Angger, 2013, Teori Sosial Kritis; Kritik, Penerapan, dan Implikasinya, cetakan Kedepan, Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana,
Goerge, Ritzer. 2014. Teori Sosiologi Modern, Jakarta, : PT. Kencana Prenada Media Group
Hiariej, E. O. S. 2013, “Pengembalian Aset Kejahatan”. Jurnal Opinio Juris, 5 (13),
Atmasasmita, Romli in Setiadi, Edi & Kristian. 201. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu dan Sistem Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
K. Bertens. 2014, Sejarah Filsafat Kontemporer Jerman dan Inggris, PT. Gramedia, Jakarta.,
Pujiyono, 2013, “Rekonstruksi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Kemandirian Kekuasaan Kehakiman”, Jurnal MMH, 41 (1),
Sinaga, C. 2017, “Kajian Terhadap Pidana Penjara Sebagai Subsider Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi”. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 1 (2),