ASAS ITIKAD BAIK SEBAGAI ALASAN PENOLAKAN GUGATAN OLEH PENGADILAN NIAGA DALAM GUGATAN PEMBATALAN MEREK TERDAFTAR

  • Selamat Lumban Gaol Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: The principle of good faith, Cancellation of trademarks, Commercial Court, Rejection of lawsuits.

Abstract

The principle of good faith is a fundamental legal principle in the registration and protection of registered trademarks, so it can be a reason for rejecting a lawsuit to cancel a registered trademark in the Commercial Court, if the Plaintiff cannot prove that the registration of the disputed trademark was carried out by the Defendant in bad faith. This article will examine how good faith is regulated in trademark registration based on the 2016 Trademark Law?, and what requirements must be met when filing a lawsuit for canceling a registered mark in the Commercial Court?, as well as how to apply the principle of good faith as a reason for rejecting a lawsuit for canceling a registered mark by the Court. Commerce? This article is the result of normative legal research, using a statutory, case and concept approach, using secondary data, with qualitative data analysis. The research results show that the regulation of good faith is regulated in Article 21 paragraph (3) and Article 77 paragraph (2) of the 2016 Trademark Law, and the requirements that must be fulfilled in filing a lawsuit for cancellation of a registered trademark at the Commercial Court meet the formal and material requirements in Article 76 to Article 79 and Articles 85 to Article 90 Jo. Article 21 of the 2016 Trademark Law, as well as the application of the principle of good faith as a reason for rejecting a claim for cancellation of a registered mark by the Commercial Court, is casuistic and proportional and objective according to the legal facts revealed in the trial.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chandra, D. W. (2020). Perlindungan Merek Terkenal Asing Yang Belum Terdaftar Di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Sengketa Merek KEEN). Jurnal Notarius, 13(1), 313.
CNN. (2022). Kronologi Gugatan Merek Geprek Ruben Onsu. Cnnindonesia.Com. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20220411142618-92-783226/kronologi-gugatan-merek-geprek-ruben-onsu
Djubaedillah, M. D. dan R. (1993). Hak Milik Intelektual (Sejarah, Teori, dan Prakteknya di Indonesia). Citra Aditya Bakti.
Garner, B. A. (2004). Black’s Law Dictionary, Eight Edition.
Harahap, M. Y. (1996). Tinjauan Merek Secara Umum dan Hukum Merek di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 1992. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Ifrani, M. F. N. Y. N. (2018). Iktikad Tidak Baik dalam Pendaftaran dan Model Penegakan Hukum Merek di Indonesia. JH Ius Quia Iustum, 25(2), 219–236.
Iqbal, Z. A. & M. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Merek Yang Terdaftar. Ius Constituendum, 5(1), 47.
Kompas. (2020). Sebelum Dirikan “Ayam Geprek Bensu”, Ruben Onsu Pernah Jadi Brand Ambassador “I Am Geprek Bensu.” Kompas.Com. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2020/06/12/14425161/sebelum-dirikan-ayam-geprek-bensu-ruben-onsu-pernah-jadi-brand-ambassador?page=all
Liputan6. (2021). Selain GoTo, Berikut 6 Sengketa Merek Dagang di Indonesia yang Mencuat ke Publik. Liputan6.Com. https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/4706459/selain-goto-berikut-6-sengketa-merek-dagang-di-indonesia-yang-mencuat-ke-publik?page=5
Loughlan, P. (1998). Intellectual Property: Creative and Marketing Rights.
Mamudji, S. S. S. (2014). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Cet. 16. Rajawali Pers.
Mardianto, A. (2010). Penghapusan Pendaftaran Merek Berdasarkan Gugatan Pihak Ketiga. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 10(1), 47.
Marzuki, P. M. (2010). Penelitian Hukum (Cet. Ke-6). Kencana.
Romadhona, T. T. Y. M. (2022). Analisis Kasus Plagiarisme Merek Dagang Antara I Am Geprek Bensu Dan Geprek Bensu. Prosiding SNADES 2022 – Desain Kolaborasi Interdisipliner Di Era Digital.
Santoso, D. A. P. B. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Pembatalan Merek Dagang Terkait Prinsip Itikad Baik Dalam Sistem Pendaftaran Merek. Notarius, 15(2), 660–675.
Soelistyo, H. (2016). Badfaith Dalam Hukum Merek. Maharsa Artha Mulia.
Sujatmiko, A. (2010). Prinsip Hukum Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Passing Off Dalam Hukum Merek. Jurnal Yuridika, 25(1), 53.
Sujatmiko, A. (2011). Tinjauan Filosofis Perlindungan Hak Milik Atas Merek. Jurnal Media Hukum, 18(2), 177.
Suparmono, G. (2003). Menyelesaikan Sengketa Merek Menurut Hukum Indonesia. Rineka Cipta.
Tempo. (2022). Ruben Onsu Digugat Rp 100 Miliar Soal Merek Geprek Bensu, Begini Kronologinya. Tempo.Co. https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/1582145/ruben-onsu-digugat-rp-100-miliar-soal-merek-geprek-bensu-begini-kronologinya
Usman, R. (2004). Dimensi Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Utomo, T. S. (2010). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) Di Era Globalisasi Sebuah Kajian Kontemporer. Graha Ilmu.
Wahyono, A. P. P. C. C. (2023). Analisis Pertimbangan Majelis Hakim Agung Menolak Permohonan Kasasi Dalam Kasus Sengketa Merek. Jurnal Evidence of Law, 2(2), 232–246.
Published
2023-02-28
How to Cite
Lumban Gaol, S. (2023). ASAS ITIKAD BAIK SEBAGAI ALASAN PENOLAKAN GUGATAN OLEH PENGADILAN NIAGA DALAM GUGATAN PEMBATALAN MEREK TERDAFTAR. UNES Law Review, 5(2), 618-627. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i2.1790

Most read articles by the same author(s)