Kedudukan Prinsip Imparsialitas atas Gugatan Vexatious dalam Penegakan Hukum pada Proses Mediasi

Main Article Content

Teddy Prima Anggriawan
Shinfani Kartika Wardhani
Donny Yuhendra Wibiantoro

Abstract

Impartiality is basically a principle that is applied to the mediation process, where the mediator is obliged to apply this principle without taking sides with either party. However, as development continues to progress, it is found that there are parties who actually litigate issues based on bad faith. This is usually called a vexational lawsuit, which is filed by a party with the sole aim of annoying the opposing party. Based on this, it is then worth exploring the position of the principle of impartiality by mediators in the mediation process when faced with filing a lawsuit which is indicated to be a vexatious lawsuit which could of course end up harming one of the parties. The type of research used is normative juridical. The approach is towards statutory regulations and legal concepts. The research results found that the principle of impartiality is a basic principle that must be applied by mediators in the mediation process. The indication that there is a vexatious claim does not actually constitute the mediator's authority to assess further to side with one of the parties. The mediator only focuses on reconciling the parties. The position of the principle of impartiality must therefore still be upheld, because it is a standard concept in civil law which is related to the realization of legal certainty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Anggriawan, T. P., Wardhani, S. K., & Wibiantoro, D. Y. (2024). Kedudukan Prinsip Imparsialitas atas Gugatan Vexatious dalam Penegakan Hukum pada Proses Mediasi. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 7395-7405. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1633
Section
Articles

References

Asikin, Zainal. (2019). Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.
Bachtiar. (2021). Mendesain Penelitian Hukum. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
C., Tinuk Dwi. (2022). Metode Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa: Mediasi terhadap Permasalahan Hukum (dalam Teori dan Praktek). Malang: UMM Press.
D., Ni Kadek Candra N. & M., Kadek Julia. (2022). “Skema Penyelesaian Sengketa melalui Proses Mediasi Berdasarkan Perma No. 1 Tahun 2016”. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 6 (2); 5213-5220.
Handayani, Dwi. (2021). Asas-Asas Hukum Acara Perdata: Tinjauan Filosofis Normatif Asas “Audi Et Alteram Partem”. Makassar: Nas Media Pustaka.
Harahap. Yahya (2017). Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
I., Nur Iftitah. (2018). “Mediasi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa”. Semnas HES FAI UMP Tahun 2018: 32-45.
Kadarudin. (2021). Penelitian di Bidang Ilmu Hukum (Sebuah Pemahaman Awal). Semarang: Formaci.
M., Randy Atma R. (2021). “Penyelesaian Sengketa Jalur Mediasi sebagai Perwujudan Kembalinya Hukum Berbasis Kearifan Lokal”. Bilancia, 15(2); 281-306.
N., Susanti Adi. (2019). Manfaat Mediasi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Kencana Jakarta.
Qamar, Nurul. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum Doktrinal dan Non doctrinal. Makassar: Social Politic Genius (SIGn).
Renggong, Ruslan & R., Dyah Aulia R. (2021). Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Perspektif Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Riyadi, Machli. (2018). Teori Iknemook dalam Mediasi Malapraktik Medik. Jakarta: Kencana.
Santoso, Edi. (2018). Pengaruh Era Globalisasi terhadap Hukum Bisnis. Jakarta: Kencana.
Shomad, Abd. & Thalib, Prawitra. (2020). Pengantar Filsafat Hukum. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.
Wiantara, I Komang. (2018). “Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan Berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2016”. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 7 (4); 456-467.