Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Selaku Penerima Fidusia Atas Jaminan Fidusia Berupa Truk yang Disita Untuk Negara (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tanjung Redeb Nomor:9/PDT.BTH/2019/PN.TNR)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1900Keywords:
Legal Protection, FiduciaryAbstract
A number of regulations include legal protection for legal subjects, both preventive and enforcement, which can be in the form of written or unwritten regulations. In the context of selling objects used as fiduciary collateral, creditors can be legally protected if the state confiscates the object. Fiduciary, essentially, involves transferring ownership rights to an item in the belief that the owner of the item will retain control of it. However, the state can confiscate items that are the subject of fiduciary guarantees if they are used for unlawful activities. Attention to this matter is important for finance companies which may experience losses due to state confiscation of objects used as fiduciary collateral.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Sulaeman A, Hudiya F.I, Khotimah H, Mulyani I.S, Analisis Lembaga Keuangan NonBank Dan Perannya Dalam Perekonomian, Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Indonesia, Vol.2 (1), 2020, hal.145
Pamella Yohana Christy, Pelaksanaan eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2021 di Lembaga PT.X Finance Yogyakarta. 2020
Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, Kebebasan Berkontrak dan Perlindungan yang Seimbang Bagi Para Pihak dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank di Indonesia, Jakarta : Institut Bankir Indonesia, hal. 65- 66
Sentosa Sembiring, 2000, Hukum Perbankan, Mandar Maju, Bandung, hal.51
H. Salim HS, 2004, Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia, cet. 1. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, hal. 6.
Soejono, and H Abdurahman. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2003.
Djanggih, Hardianto. "Pertimbangan Hakim pada Putusan Praperadilan: Studi Putusan Nomor: 09/Pid.Pra/2016/PN.Lwk Tentang Penghentian Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Politik Uang." Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 2017: 415.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group. Jakarta. 2008.
Pamella Yohana Christy, Pelaksanaan eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2021 di Lembaga PT.X Finance Yogyakarta. 2020
Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, Kebebasan Berkontrak dan Perlindungan yang Seimbang Bagi Para Pihak dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank di Indonesia, Jakarta : Institut Bankir Indonesia, hal. 65- 66
Sentosa Sembiring, 2000, Hukum Perbankan, Mandar Maju, Bandung, hal.51
H. Salim HS, 2004, Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia, cet. 1. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, hal. 6.
Soejono, and H Abdurahman. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2003.
Djanggih, Hardianto. "Pertimbangan Hakim pada Putusan Praperadilan: Studi Putusan Nomor: 09/Pid.Pra/2016/PN.Lwk Tentang Penghentian Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Politik Uang." Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 2017: 415.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group. Jakarta. 2008.
Downloads
Published
2024-05-31
How to Cite
Dwiandi Adam, A. R. ., & Adam, R. C. . (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Selaku Penerima Fidusia Atas Jaminan Fidusia Berupa Truk yang Disita Untuk Negara (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tanjung Redeb Nomor:9/PDT.BTH/2019/PN.TNR). UNES Law Review, 6(3), 9489–9495. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1900
Issue
Section
Articles
