Implementasi Kewajiban Kurator dalam Pembayaran Upah Pekerja Debitur Pailit: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 232 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021

Main Article Content

Donita Marsha Marrietta
Richard C. Adam

Abstract

This research focuses on the construction of wrongful acts related to the duties of curators and the considerations of judges in Supreme Court decisions. The research aims to gain in-depth understanding of wrongful acts by curators and how judges consider such cases. The theoretical contribution of the research is expected to enhance the understanding of wrongful acts in curator actions. Practically, the research results are anticipated to offer new perspectives for legal researchers and practitioners, as well as guidance for those involved in bankruptcy cases, emphasizing the principles of justice, legal utility, and legal certainty. The research has the potential to enrich legal insights related to bankruptcy and support the improvement of legal policies and practices in facing bankruptcy challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Marrietta, D. M., & Adam, R. C. (2023). Implementasi Kewajiban Kurator dalam Pembayaran Upah Pekerja Debitur Pailit: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 232 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 5780-5791. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1357
Section
Articles

References

Abdulkadir Muhammad, 2004. Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya
Amiruddin dan Zainal Azikin, 2010. Pengantar Hukum Metode Penelitian, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
Barda Nawawi Arief, 2007. Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group
Darji Darmodiharjo & Shidarta. 1995. Pokok-Pokok Filsafat Hukum (Apa dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum Indonesia). Jakarta. Penerbit PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Hans Kelsen, 2011. General Theory of Law and State diterjemahkan oleh Rasisul Muttaqien. Bandung. Penerbit Nusa Media
Kartono, 1982, Kepailitan dan Pengunduran Pembayaran, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta
Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto, 2017. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Munir Fuady. 2003. Aliran Hukum Kritis; Paradigma Ketidakberdayaan Hukum.
Bandung. Penerbit Citra Aditya Bakti
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2005. Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Prenada Media Grup,
R. Subekti dan R. Tjitrosudibio. 1973. Kamus Hukum. Jakarta. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Rachmat Setiawan, 1982. Tinjauan Elementer Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum, Alumni, Bandung
Salim H.S.,2006. Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta Sentosa Sembiring, 2006.Hukum Kepailitan Dan Pearturan Perundang-Undangan
Yang terkait Dengan Kepailitan, Bandung, CV.Nuansa Aulia, Cetakan-1, November
Soerjono Soekanto, 1986. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia press
Soerjono Soekanto, 2005.Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
Siti Soemarti Hartono. 1981. Pengantar Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Pembayaran.Yogyakarta. Seksi Hukum Dagang FH UGM
Sunarmi,2010 Hukum Kepailitan Edisi 2, PT.Sofmedia
Victor Situmorang & Soekarso. 1994. Pengantar Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia.
Jakarta Rineka Cipta
Zaeny Asyhadie. 2005. Hukum Bisnis Proses dan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia.
Jakarta. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada