General Principles of Good Government on the Competence of Government Apparatus in Making State Administration Decisions

Article Sidebar

ARTICLE PDF
Published: Nov 10, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1139
Keywords:
General Principles of Good Government, Government Apparatus, State Administrative Decisions

Main Article Content

Askari Razak
Faculty of Law, Indonesian Muslim University, Indonesia

Abstract

This research will focus on specific aspects in PTUN decisions that can act as a guide for government officials in improving the quality of administrative decision making. Investigating the impact of PTUN decisions on changes or improvements to administrative policies within government officials is also the aim of this research. This research will identify potential gaps between PTUN decisions and administrative decision-making practices by government officials, as well as analyze the implications of these gaps for their competence. Furthermore, this research will examine how participation and coordination between government officials and legal institutions such as PTUN, can contribute to enriching the process of making better administrative decisions. The research method used is the normative juridical method. It is hoped that the results of this research will provide new insight into the importance of collaboration between government officials and legal institutions in improving the quality of administrative decision making in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Razak, A. (2023). General Principles of Good Government on the Competence of Government Apparatus in Making State Administration Decisions. UNES Law Review, 6(1), 3452-3459. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1139
Issue
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Hak cipta :

Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:

  1. Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
  2. Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
  3. Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.

References

Asshiddiqie, J. (2011). The idea of the Indonesian rule of law. Paper Presented at the National Legal Development Planning Dialogue Forum Organized by the National Legal Development Agency of the Ministry of Law and .
Asyiah, N. (2015). Textbook of State Administrative Court Procedure Law . Deepublish.
Bima, MR, & Saputra, IE (2022). Implications of the Constitutional Court Ruling on the Binding Character of the Election Organizer Ethics Council Decision. Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation , 2 (6), 769–776.
Dani, U. (2018). UNDERSTANDING THE POSITION OF THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN INDONESIA: UNITY OF JURISDICTION OR DUALITY OF JURISDICTION SYSTEM? A STUDY ON THE STRUCTURE AND ITS CHARACTERISTICS/UNDERSTANDING ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN INDONESIA: UNITY OF JURISDICTION OR DUALITY OF JURISDICTION SYSTEM? A STUDY OF HIERARCHY AND CHARACTERISTICS. Journal of Law and Justice , 7 (3), 405–424.
Hadjon, P., Lotulung, PE, & Laica, HM (2010). Administrative law and good governance. LECTURER BOOK-2010 .
Harjiyatni, FR, & Suswoto, S. (2017). Implications of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration on the Function of the State Administrative Court. Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal , 24 (4), 601–624.
Hayati, T., Nursandi, H., & Danesjvara, A. (2005). Development administration: a legal and planning approach . Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia.
Jazim, H. (1999). Implementation of General Principles of Proper Government Administration (AAUPB) . Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Koesoemahatmadja, RDH (1975). Introduction to Indonesian state administrative law . Alumni.
Marbun, SF (1988). State Administrative Court. Liberty, Yogyakarta .
Marbun, SF (2002). Administrative Justice and Administrative Efforts in Indonesia .
Putrijanti, A., Leonard, LT, & Utama, KW (2018). The role of PTUN and AUPB is towards good governance. Pulpit Law-Faculty of Law, Gadjah Mada University , 30 (2), 277–290.
Riza, D. (2018). State Administrative Decisions According to the State Administrative Court Law and the Government Administration Law. Journal of Bina Mulia Hukum , 3 (1), 85–102.
Saputra, IE, & Hasbi, H. (2021). Effectiveness of Supervision by the Makassar City Ombudsman on the Delivery of Public Services in Makassar City. Kalabbirang Law Journal , 3 (2), 107–120.
Soekanto, S. (2007). Normative legal research: A brief review .
Shaha, A. (2017). The existence of state administrative courts (ptun) in realizing good governance .