Analisis Putusan Hakim Tentang Delik Perbankan Terkait Pengembalian Dana Debitur Dalam Rangka Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7716 K/Pid.Sus/2022/Ma)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Banking plays a vital rolein a country's economy as an institution that collects funds from the public and distributes them through credit to support development.the public and distributes them through credit to support national development.development. However, the problem of non-performing loans often gets in the way,forcing banks to to find solutions including through the submission of repossessed collateral (AYDA).The resolution of non-performing loans involves credit evaluation, notification to the borrower, collateral valuation, collateral valuation, and collateral repossession. notice to the borrower, collateral valuation, agreement with the borrower, execution of collateral, auction or sale of collateral. execution, auction or sale of collateral, credit repayment, and reconciliation. This research reviews a case of banking crime involving the return of funds from the sale of collateralized assets. In this context, the court ruled that the action was not unlawful, but the Supreme Court overturned this ruling on the grounds that the verdict on the grounds of violation of Standard Operating Procedure (S.O.P), even though the refund was actually approved by the Board of Commissioners. the return had actually been approved by the Board of Commissioners. An analysis of analysis showed that the court's decision was more prudent and in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations. However, the Supreme Court gave a controversial. However, the Supreme Court gave a controversial decision by declaring the action as a criminal offense, even though fraud was absent and all processes had been properly followed. The results of this research provide a better understanding of the complexities of the and the role of the courts in assessing the actions of banks. actions of the bank. This research highlights the need for clarity in banking laws and protection of bank actions that are in accordance with the procedures regulated by law and the competent authority.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.
References
Sudirman, Antonius. (2007). Hati Nurani Hakim dan Putusannya. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti
Djumhana, Muhammad. (2006). Hukum Perbankan di Indonesia. Bandung: PT.Citra Aditya Bakti.
Fajar, Mukti., dan Yulianto. (2017). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Ratnasari, Sri Langgeng. (2012). Bank Dan Lembaga Keuangan Lainnya. Surabaya : UPN Press
Syahyuti, A., & Musdholifah, E. (2019). Determinan Kredit Bermasalah pada Perbankan di Indonesia.