THE EXISTENCE OF BASYARNAS IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDONESIA
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In legal matters, there are two attempts to resolve disputes between parties, one of which is by using a sharia-based dispute resolution system. Settlement of sharia-based disputes includes non-litigation (outside court) and/or litigation in court). Sharia disputes in court (Litigation) are requested through religious courts, and dispute resolution outside the court (Non Litigation) through sharia Arbitration bodies. In Indonesia, the institution that resolves sharia arbitration disputes is called BASYARNAS (National Sharia Arbitration Board), and the procedures for settlement are not much different from arbitration procedures in general. The legal basis for the settlement of sharia arbitration disputes is regulated in Law No. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution and furthermore regarding the execution of sharia arbitral awards is regulated in Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 08 of 2008. This research uses a qualitative method with a normative approach and uses a library research collection method, as well as analyzing documents, data, information related to BASYARNAS. The results of research on the existence of BASYARNAS still depend on the district court.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.
References
Entriani, Anik. “Arbitrase Dalam Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia.” An-Nisbah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah 3, No. 2 (2017). Https://Doi.Org/10.21274/An.2017.3.2.277-293.
Fathurrahman Djamil. Arbitrase Dalam Perspektif Sejarah Islam Dalam Arbitrase Islam Indonesia. Jakarta: Bamui Dan Bmi, 2018.
Fatima, Nadia, Ipah Ema Jumiati, And Rina Yulianti. “Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 33 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jaminan Produk Halal.” Jdkp Jurnal Desentralisasi Dan Kebijakan Publik 4, No. 1 (2023): 40–51. Https://Doi.Org/10.30656/Jdkp.V4i1.6267.
Febriansyah, Edo. “Arbitrase Dan Alternatif-Penyelesaian-Sengketa.” Manado Poss, 2021. Arbitrase-Dan-Alternatif-Penyelesaian-Sengketa.
Jamal Al-Din Al-Suyuti. Syah Al-Hafiz Sunan Al-Nasa’. Beirut: Al-Maktabah Al-Imarah, 2017.
Lewis, Bernand. Encyclopedia Of Islam. Leiden: Dar Al-Fikr, 2015.
Luwis Ma’luf. Al-Munjid Fi Al-Laughah Wa Al-‘Alam. Beirut: Al-Masyriq, 2017.
Manzilati, A. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Paradigma, Metode, Dan Aplikasi. Malang: Ub Press, 2017.
Sani, Achmad. Alhusain. Bandung: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2020.
Situmorang. “Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Nasional Di Indonesia (Enforcement Of National Arbitration Award In Indonesia).” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 17, No. 4 (2017): 24–35. Https://Iccwbo.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D, 2019.
Syalabi, Ahmad. Sejarah Dan Kebudayaan Islam. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Husna, 1990.
Zein, M. Arbitrase Dalam Perspektif Islam Dalam Arbitrase Islam Indonesia. Jakarta: Bamui Dan Bmi, 1994.