OPTIMALISASI KEWENANGAN AMICUS CURIAE KOMNAS HAM DALAM PROSES PEMERIKSAAN PERKARA DI PENGADILAN BERDIMENSI HAK ASASI MANUSIA

Main Article Content

Ridha Wahyuni
Atik Wananti

Abstract

Komnas HAM as a state institution have authorized by law to provide amicus curiae for legal settlement of public cases with a human rights dimension. Until now, Komnas HAM has carried out this authority, but in practice there are still various obstacles, both external and internal, so that its implementation has not been optimal.This study using a juridical-normative research method, with an analytical-descriptive approach to see how the law works in practice. There is a difference in the views of the judges on the position of the amicus curiae of Komnas HAM which is considered the same as the opinion of the Experts, while the Amicus Curiae is more of an institutional opinion and can be submitted individually, therefore it is necessary to issue SEMA so that there is a common view and understanding for judges in seeing this authority, Second ; UU no. No. 39/1999 on Human Rights has not clearly and firmly regulated the authority of Komnas HAM's amicus curiae, making it difficult for Komnas HAM to draft technical regulations for its implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wahyuni, R., & Wananti, A. (2022). OPTIMALISASI KEWENANGAN AMICUS CURIAE KOMNAS HAM DALAM PROSES PEMERIKSAAN PERKARA DI PENGADILAN BERDIMENSI HAK ASASI MANUSIA. UNES Law Review, 5(1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i1.286
Section
Articles

References

Asshidique, Jimly, 2008, Menuju Negara yang Demokratis, Cetakan Pertama, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi;
Febryka,Luthvi Nola,dkk, 2014, Upaya Penguatan Kelembagaan Komnas HAM, Jakarta: P3DI Setjen DPR RI dan Azza Grafik;
Harahap, Yahya,2010,Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP,Jakarta: Sinar Grafika;
Rahardjo,Satjipto,2008, Membedah Hukum Progresif, Jakarta: Kompas;
Undang-Undang No. 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia
Undang-Undang No. 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia
Ayu, Linda Pramlampita, Kedudukan Amicus Curiae di dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia, Jurnal Lex Renaissance, Volume 5, Nomor 3,Juli 2020, https://journal.uii.ac.id/Lex-Renaissance/article/view/17677/pdf;
Aulia,Fadil, et.al, The Position of Amicus Curiae Under the Indonesian of Evidence, Jurnal Media Hukum,Volume 27, No. 2, December 2020, hlm.220, https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/9796
Agung, Anak Gede Rahmadi, Amicus Curiae Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Di Pengadilan, Jurnal Kertha Semaya, Volume 9, Nomor 2, 2021,https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/download/68058/38046/
Fajarwati, Meirina,Validitas Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA)Nomor 7 Tahun 2014 tentang Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali (PK) Dalam Perkara Pidana Ditinjaun Berdasarkan UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Volume 12, Nomor 2, Juni 2017, https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/97
James F. Spriggs, et.al, Amicus Curiae and The Role Of Information at Supreme Court, Sage
Journals, June,1,1997, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/106591299705000206
Nawawi,Asror,,Komnas HAM: Suatu Upaya Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, Jurnal: Hukum Progresif, Volume XI, Nomor 1,2017, https://www.journal.ubb.ac.id/index.php/progresif/article/view/198/179
Sukinta, Konsep dan Praktik Pelaksanaan Amicus Curiae Dalam Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, Jurnal Administrasi Law & Governance, Volume 4, Nomor 1, Maret 2021, hlm.90, https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/alj/article/view/11256
Ali, 22 Januari 2012, Komnas HAM ingin menjadi “Sahabat” Pengadilan, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/komnas-ham-ingin-menjadi-sahabat-pengadilan--lt4f1bb1678c773/, dikunjungi pada 6 Januari 2022;
Muhammad Isnur, et.al, 2021, Membumikan Instrumen HAM Melalui Proses Peradilan, Jakarta: YLBHI