Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Memutuskan Perkara Kasus Pindana Korupsi di Kota Blitar

Article Sidebar

ARTICLE PDF
Published: Sep 27, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v7i1.2331
Keywords:
Corruption, Bank Teller, and Financial

Main Article Content

Agnes Levina Sesa
Universitas Airlangga
Paskah Febiola Dwi Gonstary
Univessitas Airlangga
Kahfian Yunita Maulidia
Univessitas Airlangga

Abstract

Corruption is a serious crime that harms the nation both financially and morally. This study attempts to highlight a case of corruption committed by a bank teller in Blitar City, involving numerous government officials. In the context of the case faced, one of the defendants, Evi Sulistia Watiningsih, acted as a teller at PD. BPR Artha Praja, Blitar City. This research uses a normative legal analysis method with a case study approach. The result of this study is that the defendant, Evi Sulistia Ningsih, was found guilty of committing corruption in collaboration with others, and was sentenced by the judge to four (4) years in prison and fined 100,000,000 rupiahs with an additional punishment if the fine is not paid. The punishment given by the judge is in accordance with Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning corruption (tipikor), and it is hoped that it will serve as a lesson for the defendant not to commit the same act in the future, which would harm the nation's finances

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Agnes Levina Sesa, Paskah Febiola Dwi Gonstary, & Kahfian Yunita Maulidia. (2024). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Memutuskan Perkara Kasus Pindana Korupsi di Kota Blitar. UNES Law Review, 7(1), 446-452. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v7i1.2331
Issue
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Hak cipta :

Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:

  1. Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
  2. Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
  3. Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.

References

Dirwan, A. (2019). The effect of education against corruption in Indonesia. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 12(01), 53–64.
Einstein, T., & Ramzy, A. (2020). Eksistensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. National Journal of Law, 3(2).
Jain, A. K. (2011). Corruption: Theory, evidence and policy. CESifo DICE Report, 9(2), 3–9.
Kenneth, N. (2024). Maraknya Kasus Korupsi di Indonesia Tahun ke Tahun. JLEB: Journal of Law, Education and Business, 2(1), 335–340.
Manan, B. (2003). Teori dan politik konstitusi.
Nasrullah. (2019). Teori dan Asas Pidana Korupsi. Bandar Publihsing.
Putra, N. R., & Linda, R. (2022). Impact of social change on society from the crime of corruption. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(1), 13–24.
Setiawan, I., IP, S., & Si, M. (2016). Mengikis Perilaku Korupsi Pada Birokrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Widya Praja, 42(1).
Setiawan, I., & Jesaja, C. P. (2022). Analisis Perilaku Korupsi Aparatur Pemerintah Di Indonesia (Studi pada Pengelolaan Bantuan Sosial Di Era Pandemi Covid-19). Jurnal Media Birokrasi, 33–50.
Siregar, M. (2023). ANTIKORUPSI. UWKS Press.