Penegakan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Incest Terhadap Anak di Bawah Umur dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Positif dan Hukum Pidana Islam

Authors

  • Unjur Marluga Tambunan Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Mar'ie Mahfudz Harahap Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1666

Keywords:

Law Enforcement, Islamic Criminal Law, Positive Criminal Law, Incest

Abstract

This research discusses law enforcement for perpetrators of sexual relations between individuals who still have familial relationships based on consanguinity in the perspective of positive criminal law and Islamic criminal law. By using a comparative approach method, the researcher found differences between positive criminal law and Islamic criminal law in the process of consanguineous sexual relations, especially in the complaint process, and also in the withdrawal of reports. The researcher categorizes consanguineous sexual relations as adultery, which can be legally processed after a complaint from the victim based on Article 284 paragraph (2) of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), while in Islamic law, with just one of the three existing pieces of evidence, punishment can be imposed immediately without a complaint. Furthermore, in Article 284 paragraph (4) of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), it is also stated that the complainant is allowed to withdraw their report before a judge's decision. This is different from Islamic law, where once consensual sexual relations are known to have occurred, the punishment cannot be revoked. Since consensual sexual relations are categorized as adultery, punishment is already stipulated in Islamic law as the absolute right of Allah and has been determined in the Quran. Article 294 of the Indonesian Criminal Code should be amended promptly to prevent weakness and be more effective and precise in preventing and punishing perpetrators of consanguineous sexual relations. Furthermore, society should avoid this act, as it not only constitutes a major sin but also severely damages morals and mental well-being.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Asqalani, Al-Hafizh Ibnu Hajar. (2015). Bulughul Maram: Himpunan Hadis-Hadis Hukum dalam Fikih Islam (edisi ke-2). Darul Haq.
Antara. (2023). Wali KOta Bukittinggi Ungkapan Alasan Umumkan Kasus Inses ke Publik. JawaPos.Com. https://www.jawapos.com/berita-sekitar-anda/011623102/wali-kota-bukittinggi-ungkap-alasan-umumkan-kasus-inses-ke-publik
Ariman, H. M. R., & Raghil, F. (2015). Hukum Pidana. setara Press.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2017). Pengantar Hukum Tata Negara (9th ed.). Rajawali Pers.
Detikcom, T. (2020). Nasib Malang Bayi DIbuang Ternyata Hasil Hubungan Sedarah. Detikcom. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4906465/nasib-malang-bayi-dibuang-ternyata-hasil-hubungan-sedarah
Eddyono, S. W. (2016). Tindak Pidana Inses Dalam Rancangan RKUHP. https://icjr.or.id/tindak-pidana-inses-dalam-rkuhp/
Fajar, M., & Achmad, Y. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Empiris dan Normatif. Pustaka Pelajar.
Ferdian, R. (2023). Hubungan Sedarah Bapak dan Anak Terjadi di Banten, Bayi Hasil Intim Dibuang Lantaran Cacat. Fin.Co.Id. https:fin.co.id/read/133915/hubungan-sedarah-bapak-dan-anak-terjadi-di-banten-bayi-hasil-intim-dibuang-lantaran-cacat
Hasan, B. A. S. M. (2013). Hukum Pidana Islam Jinayah. Pustaka Setia.
Husen, H. M. (1990). Kejahatan dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Rineka Cipta.
Indonesia, R. (2012). Kumpulan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum KUHPERDATA, KUHP, KUHAP. Wacana Intelektual.
Islam, M. K., Sartika, D., & Jumadi, J. (2023). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Sedarah di Nusa Tenggara Barat. Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum, 8(2).
Isnawati. (2022). Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia (Teori, Histori, Dan Dinamika I). CV.Bintang Semesta Media.
Jaenal Aripin. (2001). PIDANA ISLAM DI INDONESIA.
Katyusha, W. (2022). Apa yang Terjadi pada Anak Hasil Pernikahan Sedarah? https://hellosehat.com/sehat/informasi-kesehatan/penyakit-hasil-incest-perkawinan-sedarah/
KY. (2017). Problematika Hakim Dalam Ranah Hukum, Pengadilan, Dan Masyarakat Di Indonesia : Studi Sosio-Legal. Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
M., A. (2015). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Korporasi. Rajawali Pers.
Manan, A. (2017). Pembaharuan Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mardani. (2015). Hukum Islam PengantarIlmuHukum Islam di Indonesia. Pustaka Pelajar.
N.B, M. Z. F. (2016). Studi Analisis Tindak Pidana Inses Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam (Jinayah) dan Hukum Pidana Islam (KUHP). IAIN Walisongo Semarang.
Purwastuti, L. (2014). Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Inses Dalam Perpektif Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. JUrnal Inovatif, VII(11).
R., M. (2019). Hukum Pelaksanaan Pidana di Indonesia (Zulkarnaini (ed.)). Taman Karya.
Redaksi, T. (2019). Kitab Lengkap KUHPER, KUHAPER, KUHP, KUHAP, KUHD. Pustaka Yustitia.
RI, K. A. (2019). Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahnya. Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur’an.
Rofiah, K. (2018). Studi Ilmu Hadis. IAIN PO Press.
Santoso, R. D. P. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Inses/Incest Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Nasional. 26.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2012). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Soesilo, R. (1991). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Politeia.
Sudirman, Ahmad, “Kupasan Ibnu Rusyd Tentgang Zina dan Hukumnya” http//www.dataphone.se/~ahmad/000307. htm
Tumanggor, A. (2023). Fakta Baru Kasus Inses Ayah-Putrinya di Banyuwangi, Lahirkan 7 Anak dan Dibunuh Semua, Punya 3 Istri. Tribun Medan. https://medan.tribunnewa.com/2023/06/26/fakta-baru-kasus-inses-ayah-putrinya-di-banyiwangi-lahirkan-7-anak-dan-dibunh-semua-punya-3-istri
U.A, M. S. bin A. bin. (2014). Al-Kabir Dosa-Dosa Besar. Ummul Qura.
Yudaningsih. (2014). Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Inses Dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. VII.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-19

How to Cite

Marluga Tambunan, U. ., & Mahfudz Harahap, M. . (2024). Penegakan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Incest Terhadap Anak di Bawah Umur dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Positif dan Hukum Pidana Islam. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 7683–7692. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1666

Issue

Section

Articles