Penyelesaian Sengketa Pegadaian Terhadap Konsumen Atas Rusaknya Objek Jaminan Gadai

Authors

  • Kiscya Anastasya Mottoh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik De La Salle Manado, Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia
  • Rietha Lieke Lontoh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik De La Salle Manado, Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia
  • Helena Benedicta Tambajong Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik De La Salle Manado, Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1591

Keywords:

Pawn, Guarantee, Consumer

Abstract

PT. Pegadaian in Indonesia are regulated in Law Number 21 of 2011 concerning the Financial Services Authority and regulated in the Civil Code. Looking at the problem of damaged consumer pawn objects due to PT. Pegadaian, four-wheeled vehicles are often the object of pawn collateral for loan funds. The debt and receivable agreement and the additional guarantees are not free from errors on the part of one of the parties, such negligence is a breach of contract. Based on the losses experienced by consumers due to damaged pawned goods, the parties must resolve the dispute. This research aims to determine the legal protection for customers as consumers for damage to collateral objects as well as to determine the resolution of disputes between the parties. The research method used in this writing uses normative juridical research methods. The author uses research methods with primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The data analysis method used by the author is a qualitative method, namely describing the research results from two variables, namely cause and effect by involving legal materials. The results of the research are in accordance with the problem formulation, namely that the pawnshop must take care of the collateral so that damage does not occur in accordance with existing regulations, legal protection for consumers can be given repressive legal protection, and dispute resolution can be carried out through mediation. It is hoped that suggestions regarding this problem will enable pawnshops to pay more attention to collateral items which are pledged as deposits, and to be able to care for collateral items properly to prevent damage which could result in losses for consumers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aprilia, Rohmawati Putri dan Mas Anienda Tien Fitria, “Kedudukan Hukum Surat Bukti Gadai dalam Menjamin Kepastian Hukum Kepada Pemberi Gadai” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 6, No. 2 (2022): 10601. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/download/4105/3446/7824.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 31/POJK.05/2016 tentang Usaha Pegadaian.
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 6/POJK.07/2022 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen dan Masyarakat Di Sektor Jasa Keuangan.
Santoso, Aris Prio Agus, Widi Nugrahaningsih, Rezi, Ahmad Rifai. (2022). Kapita Selekta Hukum Perdata, Yogyakarta, PUSTAKABARUPRESS.
Sutiyoso, Bambang. (2019). Hukum Kontrak: Interpetasi dan Penyelesaian Sengketa di Indonesia, Yogyakarta, UIIPress.
Sihombing, Jonker, (2012). Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Konsep Regulasi dan Implementasi, Jakarta, Universitas Pelita Harapan.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.
Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti, “Perlindungan Hukum bagi Nasabah Perusahaan Pegadaian”, Lex Journal 6, No. 2 (2022):13. https://ejournal.unitomo.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/download/1815/876

Downloads

Published

2024-01-19

How to Cite

Anastasya Mottoh, K. ., Lieke Lontoh, R. ., & Benedicta Tambajong, H. . (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pegadaian Terhadap Konsumen Atas Rusaknya Objek Jaminan Gadai. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 7007–7012. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1591

Issue

Section

Articles