Akibat Hukum Notaris Mengubah Akta Pengikatan Perjanjian Jual Beli (PPJB): Studi Putusan Nomor: 688/PDT.BTH/2022/PN.JKT.SEL

Main Article Content

Selly Marlianti
Mella Ismelina Farma Rahayu

Abstract

The issue of the binding of the sale and purchase agreement (PPJB) in this case originates from the turmoil of buying and selling shop houses in Pasar Minggu, South Jakarta, between Harijanto Latifah and Tri Rahadian Sapta Pamarta, culminating in a civil lawsuit by Tri Rahadian at the South Jakarta District Court. The South Jakarta District Court decided that Tri Rahadian is the rightful owner of the land and shop house in Pasar Minggu, South Jakarta, and annulled the Deed of Agreement to Buy and Sell (PPJB) deemed defective and legally ineffective. The issue that will be the basis for analysis is the legal consequences for the aggrieved sellers due to the unlawful actions of the notary. The research results show legal protection for the sellers regarding changes to the Deed of Agreement to Buy and Sell (PPJB) by the Notary without their knowledge. Thus, the sellers have the right to annul changes made by the Notary without their approval, and ethical violations by the Notary can result in legal claims and sanctions in accordance with applicable regulations. Legal consequences that the Notary may face include the invalidation of the deed, ethical sanctions, and potential civil lawsuits. Sellers have the right to question the validity of changes made by the Notary and can file compensation claims. Administrative sanctions that may be imposed on the Notary emphasize the importance of compliance with professional ethical codes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Marlianti, S., & Farma Rahayu, M. I. (2023). Akibat Hukum Notaris Mengubah Akta Pengikatan Perjanjian Jual Beli (PPJB): Studi Putusan Nomor: 688/PDT.BTH/2022/PN.JKT.SEL. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 5596-5603. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1386
Section
Articles

References

Achmad Arif Kurniawan, 2016, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris Dalam Hal Pekerja Notaris Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat,” Brawijaya Law Student Journal, 1(1),
Anta Rini Utami, Dahlan Ali, dan Mohd. Din., 2016, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pejabat Notaris Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Akta Autentik,” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4(2),.
Aprilia Putri Suhardini, Imanudin Imanudin, dan Sukarmi Sukarmi, 2018, “Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik,” Jurnal Akta 5(1), .
Kunni Afifah, 2017, “Tanggung Jawab dan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Notaris Secara Perdata Terhadap Akta yang dibuatnya,” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 1(2), .
Rudi Indrajaya et al., 2020, Notaris dan PPAT: Suatu Pengantar, Refika Aditama, Bengkulu.
Sjaifurrachman dan Habib Adjie, 2011, Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta, Mandar Maju, Bandung,.
Teresia Din, 2019, “Pertanggungjawaban Notaris terhadap Akta Otentik Terindikasi Tindak Pidana,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19,(2),.
Virgin Venlin Sarapi, 2021, “Analisis Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik,” Lex Privatum 9(2),.