The Politics of Criminal Law in Tackling Crimes Under the Guise of Electronic Investment in Indonesia
Main Article Content
Abstract
Criminal law politics is indispensable in tackling crimes under the guise of electronic investment to overcome the rampant crime in the field of information technology. The Criminal Code, Consumer Protection Law has not been able to overcome information technology crimes, then the government issued Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions as an anticipatory step against the negative impact of advances in information technology. The cyber world has great crime potential and is very difficult to catch because most of the people present in cyberspace are fictitious. Countermeasures carried out by the government in tackling crimes under the guise of electronic investment are still oriented towards the criminal justice system, by applying the provisions in Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. Countermeasures faced by law enforcement in tackling crimes under the guise of electronic investment include, lack of law enforcement officers savvy with technology, limited facilities and infrastructure, and lack of public investment skills.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.
References
Dewi, I. R. (2022). Catat! Ini Daftar Robot Trading Ilegal di Indonesia. Https://Www.Cnbcindonesia.Com/Tech/20220221181234-37-317102/Catat-Ini-Daftar-Robot-Trading-Ilegal-Di-Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20220221181234-37-317102/catat-ini-daftar-robot-trading-ilegal-di-indonesia
Durkin, J. (1990). Application of Expert Systems in the Sciences. EXPERT SYSTEMS IN THE SCIENCES, 90(5), 171–179.
Efendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum : Normatif dan Empiris. Prenada Media.
Hatta, M. (2010). Kebijakan Politik Kriminal : Penegakan Hukum Dalam Rangka Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Pustaka Pelajar.
Herlianto, D. (2013). Manejemen Investasi Plus Jurus Mendeteksi Investasi Bodong, Gosyen Publishing. Gosyen Publishing.
Hermawanti, K., Sopiyanti, I. N., Nufus, H. Z., & Kuswandi, K. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investor pada Investasi Illegal Secara Online dalam Perspektif Viktimologi. Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v6i2.4687
Khan, I., Lei, H., Khan, A., Muhammad, I., Javeed, T., Khan, A., & Huo, X. (2021). Yield gap analysis of major food crops in Pakistan: Prospects for food security. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(7), 7994–8011.
Mahendra, R. (2023). Begini Cara Robot Trading ATG Memikat Korbannya. Https://Kabar24.Bisnis.Com/Read/20230313/16/1636644/Begini-Cara-Robot-Trading-Atg-Memikat-Korbannya. https://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20230313/16/1636644/begini-cara-robot-trading-atg-memikat-korbannya
Mahroni. (2016). Pengantar Politik Hukum Pidana. Anugrah Utama Rahardja.
Marzuki, P. M. (2018). Penelitian Hukum (2nd ed.). Kencana.
Napitupulu, J. H. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Korban Investasi “Fiktif” Melalui Media Online Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. To-Ra, 7(1).
Perkasa, R. E., Serikat, N., Bambang, P., & Turisno, E. (2016). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM TRANSAKSI JUAL/BELI ONLINE (E-COMMERCE) DI INDONESIA. In DIPONEGORO LAW JOURNAL (Vol. 5, Issue 4).
Saptohutomo, A. P. (2022). Siapa Reza Paten yang Jadi Tersangka Investasi Bodong Robot Trading Net89? . Https://Nasional.Kompas.Com/Read/2022/11/06/11485931/Siapa-Reza-Paten-Yang-Jadi-Tersangka-Investasi-Bodong-Robot-Trading-Net89. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/11/06/11485931/siapa-reza-paten-yang-jadi-tersangka-investasi-bodong-robot-trading-net89
Sri Krisnha Wardhana, R. (2021). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Penipuan Melalui Sarana Elektronik. Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum, 5. www.olx.co.id
Sumadi, H. (2016). KENDALA DALAM MENANGGULANGI TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 33(2), 175. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v33i2.102
Suteki, & Galang, T. (2018). Metodologie Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat, Teori dan Praktik). Raja Grafindo.
Ties. (2022, March 22). Robot Trading Kripto Fahrenheit Ada 7.000 Member, Total Kerugian Mencapai Ratusan Miliar. Https://Jogjaaja.Com/Read/Edan-Robot-Trading-Kripto-Fahrenheit-Ada-7-000-Member-Total-Kerugian-Mencapai-Ratusan-Miliar. https://jogjaaja.com/read/edan-robot-trading-kripto-fahrenheit-ada-7-000-member-total-kerugian-mencapai-ratusan-miliar
Tumalun, B. (2015). UPAYA PENANGGULANGAN KEJAHATAN KOMPUTER DALAM SISTEM ELEKTRONIK MENURUT PASAL 30 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008. Lex Et Societatis VI, 6(2).
Wadhwa, S. (2021). Performance comparison of classifiers on twitter sentimental analysis. Proceedings of The 5th International Conference on Applied Research in Science, Technology and Knowledge, 50–61. https://doi.org/10.33422/3rd.ictle.2021.02.134
Widodo. (2013). Aspek Hukum Pidana Kejahatan Mayatara. Aswaja Pressindo.
Wijaya Kusuma, R., & Gultom, E. R. (2023). INVESTASI BODONG BERKEDOK ROBOT TRADING DENGAN SKEMA PONZI. Unes Law Review, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i4
Wisani, A. A. (2022). Investasi Adalah: Pengertian, Jenis, Dan Manfaat. Https://Universalbpr.Co.Id/Blog/Investasi-Adalah/. https://universalbpr.co.id/blog/investasi-adalah/