AKIBAT HUKUM TERHADAP PERJANJIAN GADAI YANG OBJEK GADAI BUKAN HAK MILIK DEBITUR (Studi Putusan Nomor 170/Pdt.G/2018/PN Skt)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
A pawn agreement is an agreement between the creditor and the debtor, where the creditor obtains collateral for the goods provided by the debtor, and the debtor obtains collateral for the goods bound by him in the form of a money loan. The goods used as collateral or bound by a pawn agreement must be goods that belong to the debtor. The problem that can be discussed in this paper is the legal consequences of a pawn agreement with a pawn object that does not belong to the debtor as collateral and the judge's consideration in Decision Number 170/Pdt.G/2018/PN Skt. related to the object of pawn collateral. This paper uses normative juridical research methods. The conclusion of this research is that a pawn agreement held as collateral for a pawn object that does not belong to the debtor can make the pawn agreement null and void in accordance with Article 1320 of the Civil Code and analogous to the provisions of Article 1471 and the judge's consideration is correct and in accordance with applicable regulations. The verdict decided that The Joe An had legally committed a tort against PT Pegadaian and stated that the evidence which was also the object of the pawn collateral in this case must be returned to Koentjahjono Tanto as the owner of the gold shop.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.
References
Agus Yudha Hernoko, Hukum Perjanjian Asas Propoposionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial, Prenada Media Group, 2010.
Edy Sasmito, dkk, Pegadaian dan Rakyat Kecil, IPB Pers, Bogor
J. Satrio, Wanprestasi Menurut KUHPerdata, Doktrin, dan Yurisprudensi, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2012.
Kartini Muljadi dan Gunawan Widjaja, Perikatan Yang Lahir Dari Perjanjian, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2003.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUH Perdata)
Peraturan Pemerintah No. 51 Tahun 2011 tentang PT. Pegadaian (Persero)
PT. Pegadaian (Persero), Surat Edaran Direksi No : 9/SP300233/2001 tentang Pedoman Penyelesaian Kasus Kejahatan
Putusan Pengadilan Nomor: 170/Pdt.G/2018/PN. Skt, Selasa Tanggal 27 November 2018.
Ida Ayu Gede Narasanti, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap PT Pegadaian (Persero) Dalam Hal Barang Jaminan Gadai Bukan Milik Debitur, Udayana Master Law Journal Vol. 5, No. I, 2016, hlm 71. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jmhu/article/view/21401 Diakses pada tanggal 5 Juli 2023 Pukul 15.27
https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt4c3d1e98bb1bc/hukum-perjanjian Diakses pada tanggal 5 Juli 2023 pada pukul 15.30