TINDAK PIDANA PEMERASAN DAN PENGANCAMAN MELALUI MEDIA SOSIAL (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI MATARAM NOMOR 272/PID.SUS/2019/PN.MTR)

Authors

  • Endri Susanto Universitas Mataram (UNRAM)
  • Lalu Parman UNIVERSITAS MATARAM
  • Ufran Ufran UNIVERSITAS MATARAM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.409

Keywords:

Crime, Extortion, Threats, Social Media.

Abstract

This research is a normative legal research that aims to analyze the concept of the crime of extortion and threats through social media in the formulation of Article 27 paragraph (4) of the ITE Law and to analyze the considerations of judges in acquitting decisions (vrijspraak) against cases of criminal acts of extortion and threats through social media in Mataram District Court Decision No. 272/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Mtr. The results of the research are analyzed that the previous offense of extortion and threats (afpersing en afdreiging) in the Criminal Code were two different crimes, but the ITE Law formulates the crime of extortion and threats in one formulation of the Article. Extortion and threats carried out through electronic media use the element of extortion as the first element because extortion is the substance, while threats are a method used by perpetrators to carry out acts of extortion. In the acquittal (vrijspraak) against the criminal act of extortion and threats through social media in the Mataram District Court Decision Number 272/Pid.Sus/2019/Pn.Mtr that at the trial the Defendant explained the intent and purpose of the Defendant in providing comments on Social Media was so that funds Earthquake assistance was quickly realized by the Regional Government of Kab. North Lombok, Another consideration is that based on proven legal facts, the defendant's posting on his Facebook account was not motivated by extortion and the defendant did not get any benefit, therefore the element of extortion and/or threats was not proven.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asikin, Zainal & Amiruddin. 2018. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Chazawi, Adami. (2005). Hukum idana Bagian 1. Jakaryta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Chazawi, Adami & Ardi Ferdian. (2010). Tindak Pidana Informasi & Transaksi Elektronik, Malang: MNC Publishing
Chazawi, Adami. (2003). Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Benda, Malang: Bayu Media.
Jan Remmelink. (2003) Hukum Pidana Komentar Atas Pasal -Pasal Terpenting Dari KUHP Belanda dan Padanannya Dalam KUHP Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Lamintang, P.A.F.. (1984). Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Sinar Baru.
Lamintang, P.A.F.. (2013). Pembahasan KUHAP Menurut Ilmu Pengetahuan Hukum Pidana Dan Yurisprudensi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Lamintang, P.A.F. & Djisman Samosir. (2019). Delik-delik Khusus: Kejahatan yang ditujukan terhadap hak milik dan lain-lain hak yang timbl dari hak milik, Cetakan ketiga. Bandung: CV. Nuansa Aulia.
Moeljatno. (1993). Azas-Azas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Pusat Bahasa. (2009). Kamus Besar bahasa Indonesia. edisi ke empaT. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Renggong, Ruslan. (2017). Hukum Pidana Khusus, Jakarta: Kencana.
Rusmana, Agus. (2015). “Penipuan dalam Interaksi Melalui Media Sosial (Kasus Peristiwa Penipuan melalui Media Sosial dalam Masyarakat Berjejaring),” Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan, 3(2); 187-194.
Undang-undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang perubahan atas Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (ITE).

Downloads

Published

2023-03-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

TINDAK PIDANA PEMERASAN DAN PENGANCAMAN MELALUI MEDIA SOSIAL (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI MATARAM NOMOR 272/PID.SUS/2019/PN.MTR). (2023). UNES Law Review, 5(3), 1167-1188. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.409