Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Indonesia dan Australia Tentang Pengaturan Pertimbangan Bisnis (Business Judgement)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1821Keywords:
Comparative Legal System, Business Judgement, Business Judgement RuleAbstract
The legal systems adopted by Indonesia and Australia have differences, Indonesia adheres to civil law while Australia adheres to common law. The author in this study intends to conduct a comparative study of the legal system between Indonesia and Australia regarding business judgment arrangements. The issues studied are about the similarities and differences between business judgment arrangements in Indonesia and Australia, as well as the factors that cause these similarities and differences. The author uses normative methods by using a legal approach in the preparation of this study. The results of the comparison of legal systems between Indonesia and Australia have similarities, namely in terms of legal rules where both already have written legal rules, and the second in terms of regulating business judgment for the Board of Directors, while the differences that are seen are different legal systems, implementation of written rules, origin of rules, substance of rules, and position of jurisprudence. The factors that cause these similarities and differences include historical factors of the country, thinking characteristics, and economics.
Downloads
References
Bryan, A., Garner, G., & et all. (2014). Black Law Dictionary. Dalam Dictionary.
De Cruz, P. (1999). Comparative Law in a Changing World. Dalam Leiden Journal of International Law (Vol. 2).
Friedman, L. M., & Hayden, G. M. (2017). American law: An introduction. Dalam American Law: An Introduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190460587.001.0001
Gozali, D. S. (2020). Pengantar Perbandingan Sistem Hukum: Vol. I (Ifrani & M. E. Amin, Ed.; I). Nusa Media.
Gunawan, B., & Gunadi, A. (2023). Doctrin Business Judgment Rule Analysis as an Effort to Protect the Law of Directors of Limited Liability Companies in Indonesia and the United States. Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 2(10). https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v2i10.160
Huda, H. M., & Sh, M. (2020). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum. CV Cendekia Press.
Kuswandi, K., Junadi, Y., & Putri, A. (2022). Penerapan Prinsip Business Judgement Rule Dalam Putusan Lepas Terkait Tindak Pidana Korupsi Direktur Korporasi. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v8i2.3083
Masrurah, B. O. (2019). KONSEP ITIKAD BAIK DALAM PENERAPAN BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE BERDASARKAN SISTEM HUKUM PERSEROAN INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan), 3(3). https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v3i3.830
Mulyana, A. N. (2018). Business judgment rule: praktik peradilan terhadap penyimpangan dalam pengelolaan BUMN/BUMD. Grasindo.
Qomar, N. (2010). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum dan Peradilan. Dalam Makassar: Penerbit Refleksi (Cetakan Pertama). Pustaka Refleksi.
Rajaguguk, E. (2016). Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) Dalam Bentuk Perseroan Terbatas. https://repository.uai.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Badan-Usaha-Miliki-Negara-Dalam-Bentuk-Perseroan-Terbatas_SA_2016_editor.pdf
Rissy, Y. Y. W. (2020). KETENTUAN DAN PELAKSANAAN BUSINESS JUDGEMENT RULE DI AMERIKA, AUSTRALIA DAN INDONESIA. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(2). https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.2.2020.160-171
Salenda, K. (2022). Penerapan prinsip Business Judgment Rule (BJR) terhadap Putusan Direksi Perusahaan Perseroan Terbatas. Alauddin Law Development Journal, 4(3), 503–519. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v4i3.18819
Shodiq, D. M., & Djafar Shodiq, S. H. (2023). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum. PT Mafy Media Literasi Indonesia.
Sinaga, M. Y., & Saleh, R. (2023). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Indonesia dan Australia terkait Kewenangan Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara. Citra Justicia : Majalah Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 24(1).
Wardhana, G. P. (2019). BUSINESS JUDGEMENT RULE SEBAGAI PERLINDUNGAN ATAS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PRIBADI DIREKSI PERSEROAN. Jurnal Riset Manajemen dan Bisnis, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.21460/jrmb.2019.141.316
