TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP KEDUDUKAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 20/PUU-XIV/2016

Main Article Content

I Nengah Ariana

Abstract

Information technology plays an important role for the present and the future which in itself changes people's behavior. Information technology contributes to the law of evidence in Indonesia with the recognition of electronic evidence. In 2016, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia issued the Constitutional Court Decision Number 20/PUU-XIV/2016 which had a juridical impact on changing the definition of legal electronic evidence. This decision is considered contrary to the spirit of the ITE Law and causes a blurring of norms regarding the legal position of electronic evidence. The purpose of this study is to examine the legal regulation of the position of electronic evidence and the legal consequences of the Constitutional Court's decision Number 20/PUU-XIV/2016. This research is classified as qualitative research with a normative juridical method, so that the sources used come from library data, both primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The results of this study state that the legal arrangement for the position of electronic evidence in Indonesia in the ITE Law has changed since the Constitutional Court Decision Number 20/PUU-XIV/2016 which has provided an interpretation of the phrase electronic information and/or electronic documents in article 5 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), and article 44 letter b of the ITE Law regarding the provisions of legal evidence and has implications for the function of electronic evidence in criminal law, namely the emergence of legal uncertainty over the validity of electronic evidence in court and the occurrence of differences in interpretation in law enforcement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ariana, I. N. (2022). TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP KEDUDUKAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 20/PUU-XIV/2016. UNES Law Review, 5(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i1.277
Section
Articles

References

Abdussalam, H.R., (2009), Hukum Kepolisian Sebagai Hukum Positif Dalam Disiplin Hukum, Jakarta: Restu Agung.
Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin, (2012), Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Cet.VI, Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Darwan, Prinst, (2002), Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Hamzah, Andi, (1986), Kamus Hukum, Surabaya: Ghalia Indonesia.
Harahap, M. Yahya, (1993), Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Jilid II, Jakarta: Pustaka Kartini.
Kansil, C.S.T., (2000), Hukum Tata Negara Republik Indonesia, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Marpaung, Leden, (1992), Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, (2008), Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.
Mulyadi, Lilik, (2004), Seraut Wajah Putusan Hakim Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Prodjohamidjojo, Martiman, (1983), Sistem Pembuktian dan Alat-Alat Bukti, Cet.I, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Sasangka, Hari dan Lily Rosita, (2003), Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Pidana: Untuk Mahasiswa dan Praktisi, Cet.I, Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Siahaan, Maruarar, (2005), Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Sitompul, Josua, (2012), Cyberspace, Cybercrime, Cyberlaw: Tinjauan Dari Aspek Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Tatanusa.
Sugiarto, Umar Said, (2013), Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Suhariyanto, Budi (2012), Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi (Cybercrime) Urgensi dan Pengaturan Celah Hukumnya, Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Heryogi, Arief, Masruchin Ruba’i, Bambang Sugiri, (2019), Fungsi Bukti Elektronik Hukum Acara Pidana Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016, Jurnal Hukum JIPPK, Vol. 2, Nomor 1, h.7-17, ISSN: 2528-0767 (p) dan 2527-8495 (e).
Nugroho, Bastianto, (2017), Peranan Alat Bukti dalam perkara pidana dalam putusan hakim menurut KUHAP, Jurnal Hukum YURIDIKA, Vol. 32, No.1, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga.
Prasetyo, Eko Surya, Y. A. Triana Ohoiwutun, Halif, (2018), Implikasi Yuridis Kebijakan Formulasi Alat Bukti Elektronik, Lentera Hukum, Universitas Jember, Vol. 5, Nomor 2, ISSN: 2355-4673 (Print) 2621-3710 (Online).
Syahrizal, Ahmad, (2007), Problem Implementasi Putusan MK, Jurnal Hukum Konstitusi, Vol. 4, Nomor 1.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia tahun 1945
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Rebublik Indonesia Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016.