Penerapan Asas Fiduciary Duty dan Piercing the Corporate Veil Terhadap Tanggungjawab Terbatas Direksi Suatu Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia dan Amerika

Main Article Content

Wayan Bimanda Panalaga

Abstract

Board of directors hold a fundamental role when it comes to company’s growth. When managing a company, board of directors must follow certain guidelines. Fiduciary duty is one of the many rules that board of directors must abide to while managing a company. Ordinarily, board of directors have a perk where they do not personally liable for company loss, but when board of directors neglect their fiduciary duty while taking an action on behalf of the company and that action caused the company to suffer loss or harm, then the board of directors are personally liable and must compensate the loss or harm that the company suffers. This happened due to piercing the corporate veil. This research used normative juridical approach and literature study with secondary data. As a conclusion, the final result of this research showed that fiduciary duty that enacted in Indonesia is slightly differs from America, due to Law Number 40 of 2007 Concerning Limited Liability Company, the Indonesian company law adheres semifiduciary duty, while the American adhere full fiduciary duty. Therefore, the regulation regarding piercing the corporate veil in America is more detailed and broader than the ones in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Panalaga, W. (2023). Penerapan Asas Fiduciary Duty dan Piercing the Corporate Veil Terhadap Tanggungjawab Terbatas Direksi Suatu Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia dan Amerika. UNES Law Review, 6(1), 1967-1977. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.958
Section
Articles

References

Ardison Asri. (2017). Doktrin Piercing The Corporate Veil Dalam Pertanggung Jawaban Direksi Perseroan Terbatas, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, Volume 8.
Bernard S. Black. (2001). The Principal Fiduciary Duties of Boards of Directors.
Esme Faerber. (2008). All about Stocks: The Easy Way to Get Started, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Johnny Ibrahim. (2006). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Jonathan Macey and Joshua Mitts. (2014). Finding Order in the Morass: The Three Real Justifications for Piercing the Corporate Veil, 100 Cornell L. Rev. 99.
Lyman P. Q. Johnson dan Mark A. Sides. (2004). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Fiduciary Duties, William Mitchell Law Review: Vol. 30: Iss. 4, Article 12.
Munir Fuady. (2008). Hukum Perusahaan Dalam Paradigma Hukum Bisnis: Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, cetakan ke-III, 2008.
M. Yahya Harahap. (20019). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, cetakan ke-VII.
Paul L. Davies. (1997). Gower’s Principles of Modern Company Law, London: Sweet Maxwell.
Phillip Lipton dan Abraham Herzberg. (1992). Understanding Company Law, Brisbane: The Law Book Company Limited.
Ridwan Khairandy. (2009). Perseroan Terbatas: Doktrin Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan Yurisprudensi, Yogyakarta: Kreasi Total Media.
Soerjono Soekanto. (2007). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
Stewart Clegg. (2017). The East India Company: The First Modern Multinational? Multinational Corporations and Organization Theory: Post Millennium Perspectives 2017, 43–67.
Virginijus Bitė, Vilija Mogenytė, dan Salvija Mulevičienė. (2022). Civil Liability of a Company Director in the Vicinity of Insolvency: The Lithuanian Approach. European Business Organization Law Review 23.
Woon Walter C. M. (2016). Woon's Corporations Law. Singapore: LexisNexis.