Derivatif Action sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum bagi Perusahaan PMA
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In running a company, the Board of Directors and Commissioners are certainly not exempt from errors, mismanagement, or fraudulent activities that may lead to actions detrimental to the company and shareholders. Therefore, there must be legal protection for the company and its shareholders. One solution to this legal protection issue is derivative lawsuits, as exemplified by Prosper China Investments Limited. Based on the above description, the author is interested in conducting research and discussion on whether the derivative action filed by PT Merge Energy Sources Development constitutes a form of legal protection for a Foreign Investment Company (PMA). Additionally, it examines the challenges and issues associated with derivative actions within the legal provisions in Indonesia. This research employs a normative juridical method, utilizing secondary data through a literature review. The findings of this study indicate that the derivative action taken by PT. Merge Energy Sources Development's shareholders is in accordance with applicable laws, as it is regulated in Article 97, paragraph (6) of the Company Law concerning directorial lawsuits and Article 114, paragraph (6) of the Company Law concerning commissioner lawsuits. However, the mechanism of derivative action as a legal protection tool in Indonesia is not yet sufficient, primarily due to the limited regulations regarding derivative actions in Indonesia compared to Common Law countries, and even in comparison to Civil Law countries.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.
References
Agus Riyanto. (2018). Substansi Derivatif action dan Masalahnya. Binus University Business Law.
Chyntia Hutagalung. (2021). Derivatif action Oleh Pemegang Saham. DHP Business Law.
Dan W Punchiak, Herald Baum and Michael Ewing-Chow. (2012). The Derivative Action in Asia : A Comparative Functional Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Bagir Manan. (1995). Interaksi Fungsi Organ PT dan Perlindungan yang diberikan kepada Pemegang Saham dan Kreditur Menurut UU No. 1 tahun 1995. Yogyakarta.
Baxt, R., Fletcher, K. and Fridman, S., Afterman and Baxt’s. (1999). Cases and Materials on Corporations and Associations, 7th Edition, Butterworths. Melbourne.
Diana Kusumasari. (2011). Kekosongan Jabatan Direksi Perseroan. Klinik Bisnis Hukumonline.
Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill. (1981-2005). The People's Law Dictionary.
Gunawan Widjaja. (2004). Seri Hukum Bisnis Tanggung Jawab Direksi Atas Kepailitan Perseroan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hans Rimbert Hemmer (et al). (2002). Negara Berkembang Dalam Proses Globalisasi Untung atau Buntung. Jakarta: Konrad Adenauer Stifftung.
Heidi Barter. (2016). Derivative Actions - What Are They?. Barter Mc Kellar Article
Jonathan R. Macey and Geoffrey P. Miller. (1991). The Plaintiffs' Attorney's Role in Class Action and Derivative Litigation: Economic Analysis and Recommendations for Reform. The University of Chicago Law Review Vol. 58, No. 1.
Julie Cassidy. (1995). Concise Corporations Law. Sydney: The Federation Press.
Muchsin. (2003). Perlindungan dan Kepastian Hukum bagi Investor di Indonesia. Disertasi S3 Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret. Surakarta.
Munir Fuadi. (2014). Doktrin-Doktrin Modern dalam Corporate Law dan Eksistensinya dalam Hukum Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Munir Fuady. (2013). Perlindungan Pemegang Saham Minoritas, CV Utomo, Bandung.
Mark Lee. (2018). Derivative Action by Shareholders; Section 216A of the Companies Act. Singapore: WMH Law Corporation.
Rafael La Porta. (1999). Investor Protection and Corporate Governance. Journal of Financial Economics No. 58.
Riska Fitriani. (2011). Derivatif action oleh Pemegang Saham Minoritas Pada Perseroan Terbatas. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Universitas Riau.
RT Sutantya R Hadhikusuma dan Sumantoro. (1996). Pengertian Pokok Hukum Perusahaan: Bentuk-Bentuk Perusahaan Yang Berlaku di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sentosa Sembiring. (2007). Hukum Investasi Pembahasan Dilengkapi dengan Undang - Undang No. 25 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penanaman Modal. Bandung: Nuansa Aulia.
Stephen J. Kastenberg. (2006). The Company v. Itself: Derivative Action Pitfalls. New York: Corporate Counsel Business Journal.
Taqiyuddin Kadir. (2014). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Saham Minoritas Melalui Derivative Action (Derivatif Action) Menurut Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia, Disertasi Sidang Doktor Universitas Jayabaya.
Taylor & Francis:Master. (2007). Companies Act 2006--directors' duties and derivative actions. London: Journal Law and Financial Markets Review.
Yahya Harahap. (2016). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.