LEGAL PROTECTION FOR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS OF ONLINE GAME SOFTWARE: THE ECONOMIC RIGHTS OF THE CREATOR
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the game industry itself, particularly in Indonesia, the majority of game developers and publishers are copyright holders who are not the creators themselves, often referred to as license holders. To analyze the legal protection for copyright holders of online game software in relation to the economic rights of the creator, Philipus M. Hadjon's Theory of Legal Protection can be used. The objectives of this research are to analyze the legal regulations for copyright holders of online game software, to analyze the legal protection for copyright holders of online game software in relation to the economic rights of the creator, and to analyze the role of the Government in providing legal protection for copyright holders of online game software. The research used a normative juridical approach, therefore the data used are secondary data obtained from existing literature. It employs qualitative juridical data analysis. The results of the research show that in the legal protection for copyright holders of online game software in relation to the economic rights of the creator, according to Philipus M. Hadjon, "there are two types of legal protection means, namely Preventive Legal Protection means that can be resolved through arbitration/non-litigation, such as Mediation, Negotiation, Conciliation, Arbitration.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.
References
Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K. A., & Davis, L. M. (2003). Empirical Testing of a Model of Online Store Atmospherics and Shopper Responses. Psychology & Marketing, 20(2), 139-150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10064
Makarim. E. (2010). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Penyelenggara Sistem Elektronik. Rajawali Pers.
Manurung, B. F. L., Syarief, E., & Shahrullah, R. S. (2022). Legal Consequences of Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations: Are They Similar?. Journal of Law and Policy Transformation, 7(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.37253/jlpt.v7i1.6746
Margono, S. (2010). Aspek Hukum Komersialisasi Aset Intelektual. Nuansa Aulia.
Phymma, M. T. A., Shahrullah, R. S., & Sudirman, L. Handling the Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia and India: A Critical Flashback in 2020. Journal of Law and Policy Transformation, 7(1), 28-43. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.37253/jlpt.v7i1.6749
Rahardjo, S. (2000). Ilmu Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Riswandi. B. A. (2003). Hukum dan Internet di Indonesia. UII Press.
Rodhin, R. (2011). Internet dalam Konteks Perpustakaan. Pustakaloka, 3(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21154/pustakaloka.v3i1.631
Sudaryat, Sudjana, & Permata, R. R. (2010). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Memahami Prinsip Dasar, Cakupan, dan Undang-Undang yang Berlaku. Oase Media.
Surbakti, K. (2017). Pengaruh Game Online terhadap Remaja. Jurnal Curere, 1(1), 28-38. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.36764/jc.v1i1.20
Wijayanti, T. W. (2013). Motif dan Adiksi Pemain Game Online: (Studi Deskriptif tentang Motif dan Adiksi Pemain Game Online Dragon Nest di Surabaya). Media Commonline, 2(1).