Juridical Review of Criminal Sanction Enforcement In Immigration Law

Main Article Content

Budiyanto Budiyanto

Abstract

The aims of this research are: 1) to find out the modus operandi of criminal acts in the Immigration sector (Study of Decision Number 713/ Pid.Sus /2022/PN Mks ), 2) to find out how the judge considered in handling down Decision Number 713/ Pid.Sus /2022 /PN Mks. The type of research used by researchers is normative legal research using the statutory and case approaches. The research materials used as a base to support this research include primary and secondary legal materials and methods. The analysis is in the form of a prescriptive method, namely an analytical method that provides an assessment ( justification ) about whether the object under study is right or wrong or what should be according to the law. The conclusion in this research is The modus operandi carried out by the Defendant who committed a Crime in the Immigration Sectors in Decision Number 713/ Pid. Sus /2022/PN Mks was by burning his passport and travel documents in 2019 because they wouldn't be detected as foreigner citizens and are considered an Indonesian citizens. Where the Defendant Mohammed Abdulaziz Khamis Bin Sanad's passport expired in 2020, but continued to live and carry out activities in Indonesian Territory without having a passport, namely from February to October 2021, the Defendant worked for a Mining Company at PT Sungai Berlian Mahakam in Samarinda. On January 15, 2022, the defendant went to Makassar city to look for coffee and would export the coffee to Arabia. 2) The judge's legal considerations in imposing a sentence on the perpetrator of a crime in the field of immigration, as in Decision Number 713/ Pid.Sus /2022/PN Mks, where the Panel of Judges have handed down a decision on the Defendant by giving a prison sentence of 4 ( four ) months and 15 ( fifteen ) days and a fine of IDR 10,000,000.00 ( ten million rupiah). The decision of the Panel of Judges takes into account the facts revealed in the trials, and basically, the judge handed down the decision based on Law number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power by paying attention to juridical and non-juridical considerations by paying attention to things that are aggravating and mitigation the Defendant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Budiyanto, B. (2024). Juridical Review of Criminal Sanction Enforcement In Immigration Law. UNES Law Review, 6(4), 10829-10838. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2058
Section
Articles

References

Arief, B.N. (2001). Law Enforcement Issues and Crime Prevention Policy. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Hamidi, J., & Christian, C. (2021). Immigration Law for Foreigners in Indonesia . Jakarta: Sinar Graphics.
Kurnia, A. (2018). Evaluation of Presidium Regulation No. 21 of 2016 concerning Free Visitor Visas, Directorate General of Immigration . Jakarta: Directorate General of Immigration.
Marzuki, PM (2008). Legal Research . Surabaya: Kencana.
Mohede, N. (2011). Criminal Sanctions Against Perpetrators of Immigration Crimes. Unsrat Law Journal , 19 (4).
Muhaimin. (2020). Legal Research Methods . NTB: Mataram University Press.
Muhlisa, AN, & Roisah, K. (2020). Immigration Law Enforcement Against Abuse of Overstay Visas for Foreign Citizens. Journal of Indonesian Legal Development , 2 (2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i2.145-147
Munandar, WS (2021). Juridical Review of the Crime of Embezzlement Using the Modus Operandi of Renting Goods (Study Decision Number 1444/Pid.B/2020/PN Mks). Thesis . Hasanuddin University.
Nugroho, OC (2016). Implementation of Projusticia Against the Surveillance of Foreigners . Jakarta: Tree of Light.
Pakpahan, H. (2019). Analysis of the Basic Considerations of Judges in Imposing Sentences to Perpetrators of Crimes of Forest Destruction (Decision Study No. 532/Pid.Sus/2018/PN-PLK). PATIK: Law Journal , 8 (1).
Pakpahan, RD, Manullang, H., & Nababan, R. (2019). Analysis of the Basic Considerations of Judges in Imposing Crimes to Those Who Clear Land by Burning (Decision Study Number 623/Pid.B/2019/PN.BTA). PATIK: Law Journal , 07 (2), 123– 136. https://ejournal.uhn.ac.id/index.php/patik
Prasetyo, T. (2019). Criminal law . Depok: Rajawali Press.
Putra, R. (2019). The Principle of Ultimum In Remedium in Immigration Crimes. Journal of Legal Studies "The Juris," 3 (1), 40.
Rahmadea, AD, Nahuddin, YE, Purwanto, A., & Rifandhana, RF (2023). Juridical Analysis of Judges' Considerations in Handing Down Decisions on Foreign Citizens Who Misuse Visit Stay Permits to Work in Indonesia. Bhirawa Law Journal , 4 (1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.26905/blj.v4i1.10341
Rifai, A. (2011). Legal Discovery by Judges in a Progressive Legal Perspective . Jakarta: Sinar Graphics.
Sanusi, A. (2017). Law Enforcement Against Criminal Misuse of Immigration Stay Permits (Study of Class I Immigration Office Bandar Lampung). Fiat Justicia:Journal of Legal Studies , 10 (2), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no2.676
Sarmawati, ER (2022). The Crime of Human Smuggling and Its Criminal Application (A Research in the Legal Area of the Tanjung Balai District Court). Student Scientific Journal in the Field of Criminal Law , 6 (4), 377–385.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2009). Normative Legal Research a Short Review, 11th Printing. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Suharto, RM (2002). Material Criminal Law Objective Elements as the Basis for Charges . Jakarta: Sinar Graphics.
Taekedangan, FR, Wattimena, JAY, & Supusepa, R. (2021). Law Enforcement Against Foreign Citizens as Perpetrators of Immigration Crimes. Sanisa , 3 (1996), 6.
Wisnubroto, AL, & Widiatama, G. (2005). Reform of Criminal Procedure Law . Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.