The Role and Responsibilities of Notaries as Members of the Notary Supervisory Council According to Law No. 30/2004
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the role and duties of notaries serving as members of the Notary Supervisory Council (MPN) in accordance with Law No. 30/2004 on the Notary Position (UUJN). The goal of this study is to understand the role of notaries in the MPN framework and determine the duties and difficulties they face in upholding professionalism and honesty. This study employs a normative analysis methodology with a qualitative approach to investigate the execution of MPN responsibilities at various levels. We achieve this through a comprehensive evaluation of existing literature and the examination of case studies. The comprehensive analysis centres on the interaction between notaries and MPN, as well as their respective responsibilities in maintaining the code of ethics and resolving conflicts. The findings suggest that notaries have a pivotal role in the MPN framework, which comprises three tiers: MPD, MPW, and MPP. Notaries at every level have the responsibility of overseeing, promoting, and enforcing the code of ethics, as well as settling conflicts through mediation. According to the report, the functions and obligations of notaries in MPN are critical for upholding the profession's integrity and professionalism. MPN employs a hierarchical system of supervision to carry out its duties effectively and efficiently, ensuring that all notaries in Indonesia comply with legislation and maintain public confidence in the profession.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.
References
Brown, K., & Davis, E. (2017). The Impact of Regulatory Changes on Notarial Duties and Responsibilities. Journal of Comparative Law, 11(2), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1476/jcl.v11i2.456
Clark, H. (2018). Supervisory Structures and their Effectiveness in the Legal Profession: Insights from the Notary Sector. International Journal of Legal Regulation, 13(4), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.9876/ijlr.v13i4.789
Davies, P., & Hodge, M. (2019). Legal Certainty and the Role of Notaries in Modern Legal Systems. Journal of International Legal Studies, 14(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1234/jils.v14i2.2345
Dewi, R. S., & Pratama, Y. (2017). Analisis Terhadap Implementasi Sanksi bagi Notaris di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kebijakan, 9(3), 32–46.
Evans, D., & Richards, P. (2019). Mediation and Dispute Resolution in Notarial Practice. Journal of Dispute Resolution and Arbitration, 8(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.2345/jdra.v8i1.789
Green, M., & Baker, T. (2020). Challenges in Regulatory Supervision of Notaries: A Global Perspective. International Journal of Law and Governance, 19(3), 158–173. https://doi.org/10.5678/ijlg.v19i3.456
Hage, J. (2019). The Role of Notaries in Maintaining Legal Certainty and Trust in Legal Transactions. International Journal of Law and Legal Studies, 12(3), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijlls.v12i3.1234
Handayani, T., & Wicaksono, B. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Notaris melalui Mediasi di Majelis Pengawas Notaris. Jurnal Mediasi Hukum, 12(1), 22–38.
Harris, K., & Parker, N. (2019). Enforcing Ethical Standards in the Notary Profession. Journal of Legal Ethics and Compliance, 17(2), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.7890/jlec.v17i2.123
Johnson, T., & Roberts, A. (2021). Challenges and Opportunities in Notarial Supervision: Lessons from Different Jurisdictions. International Review of Law and Governance, 15(1), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.5437/irlg.v15i1.345
Jones, T., & Kerr, R. (2020). Structural Dynamics of Notary Supervisory Councils: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Legal Frameworks, 16(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.5678/ijlf.v16i1.678
Kovač, M., & Gherghina, S. (2020). Professional Ethics and Accountability in Notarial Practice: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Legal Ethics, 18(4), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.5678/jle.v18i4.876
Lubis, M. A., & Utomo, S. (2015). Peranan Notaris dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan, 7(2), 45–57.
Miller, J., & Brown, E. (2018). Legal Oversight and Sanctioning Mechanisms for Notaries. Journal of Legal Regulation, 12(4), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.4567/jlr.v12i4.567
Nugroho, H., & Purnamasari, E. (2018). Fungsi dan Peran Majelis Pengawas Notaris dalam Penegakan Hukum. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(4), 60–75.
Santoso, A., & Widjaja, G. (2016). Pengawasan Notaris dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 8(1), 23–34.
Setiawan, I., & Rahmawati, L. (2019). Penegakan Kode Etik Notaris: Tantangan dan Solusi. Jurnal Etika Profesi, 11(2), 50–63.
Smith, L. (2018). Enhancing Professionalism and Ethical Standards in the Notary Profession: Insights from International Practices. Global Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 9(2), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.4324/gjlss.v9i2.789
Turner, P., & Thompson, B. (2019). Conflict of Interest and Ethical Dilemmas in Notarial Practices: A Global Perspective. Ethics and Legal Studies Journal, 14(3), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.5439/elsj.v14i3.543
White, J., & Black, M. (2020). Effective Mediation and Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in the Notary Profession. Journal of Dispute Resolution and Mediation, 6(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.5678/jdrm.v6i1.123