Euthanasia Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia

Main Article Content

Habibiellah Huda
Ismansyah Ismansyah
Edita Elda

Abstract

The increasing development of technology in the health sector has led to many new things that can be done, one of which is euthanasia which is often debated in Indonesia and around the world. Euthanasia comes from the words "eu" which means good and "thanatos" which means to die, so euthanasia means to die well. Euthanasia is a very complex and complicated problem so there are parties who are for and against euthanasia. On the one hand, euthanasia causes the loss of a person's suffering because they cannot tolerate the disease they are suffering from. However, on the other hand, euthanasia causes the loss of a person's life and violates the principles of human rights. Regulations related to this matter have not been specifically regulated in Indonesian positive law. This research aims to determine euthanasia regulations from the perspective of Indonesian criminal law, euthanasia in international regulation and comparisons with other countries, as well as the reasons why euthanasia is prohibited in Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research. The research results show that the regulation of euthanasia from the perspective of Indonesian criminal law is contained in Article 344 of the Criminal Code and Article 461 of the new Criminal Code for active euthanasia, while for passive euthanasia it is contained in Article 304 of the Criminal Code and Article 428 paragraph (1) of the new Criminal Code. In international regulation, euthanasia is not specifically regulated, but in the Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights euthanasia is contrary to the right to life, while the right to die is not regulated therein. From a comparison of 6 countries, there are countries that prohibit euthanasia, namely Indonesia, America, England and China, while the Netherlands and Germany allow euthanasia. The underlying reasons why euthanasia is prohibited in Indonesia are in the aspects of religion, positive law, court decisions, health law and human rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Habibiellah Huda, Ismansyah, I., & Edita Elda. (2024). Euthanasia Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia. UNES Law Review, 6(4), 10674-10686. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1956
Section
Articles

References

Ahmad Wardi Muslich, 2014, Euthanasia Menurut Pandangan Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam, Cetakan 1, Jakarta, PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
D. Andhi Nirwanto, 2015, Euthanasia Pidana Mati Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Jakarta Selatan, Referensi (GP Press Group).
Djoko Prakoso dan Djaman Andhi Nirwanto, 1984, Euthanasia Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Hukum Pidana, Jakarta, Ghalia Indonesia.
Elsa Gloria Pangemanan, 2019, Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Pasien Euthanasia Di Indonesia, Jurnal Lex Et Societatis, Vol. 7, No. 6.
Heri Setiawan, 2020, Analisis Yuridis Praktik Euthanasia Menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia Dengan Perbandingan Di Negara Belanda Dan Amerika Serikat, Jurnal Actual, Vol. 10, No. 1.
I Gusti Agung Gede Utara Hartawan, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi dan I Nyoman Sutama, 2020, Euthanasia Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia, Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 2.
I Made Wahyu Chandra Satriana, 2020, Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Suatu Kajian Konsep Kematian Yang Diinginkan (Euthanasia), Denpasar, Udayana University Press.
Jonah McKeown, Assisted suicide in the United States: Where is it legal?, https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/254197/assisted-suicide-in-the-united-states-where-is-it-legal.
M. Arwani, 2020, Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Euthanasia Berdasarkan Hukum Dari Beberapa Negara (Indonesia, Belanda Dan Amerika Serikat). Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 26. No. 8.
Muhammad Siddiq Armia, 2022, Penentuan Metode Dan Pendekatan Penelitian Hukum, Banda Aceh, Lembaga Kajian konstitusi Indonesia.
Nur Aini, Mahkamah Konstitusi Jerman Izinkan Eutanasia, https://internasional.republika.co.id/berita/q6c5ru382/mahkamah-konstitusi-jerman-izinkan-eutanasia.
Octaviane K. Rarung, Djemi Tomuka dan James F. Siwu, 2024, Euthanasia Viewed From Medical Ethics In Indonesia, Medical Scope Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2.
Ririn Nur Afifah dkk, 2023, Kematiaan Yang Diinginkan (Euthanasia) Berdasarkan Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jurnal Dinamika Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang, Vol. 29, No. 1.
Slamet Sampurno Soewondo, Syarif Saddam Rivanie Parawansa dan Ulil Amri, 2023, Konsep Euthanasia Di Berbagai Negara Dan Pembaharuannya Di Indonesia, Jurnal Media Luris, Vol. 6, No. 2.
Sri Warjiyati, 2020, Implementasi Euthanasia Dalam Perspektif Ulama Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, Vol. 6, No. 1.
Takdir, 2018, Pengantar Hukum Kesehatan, Cetakan I, Palopo, Lembaga Penerbit Kampus IAIN Palopo.
Urban Wiesing, the Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court Regarding Assisted Suicide: a Template for Pluralistic States, https://jme-bmjcom.translate.goog/content/48/8/542?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=id&_x_tr_hl=id&_x_tr_pto=tc.
What Do Assisted Dying, Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia Mean and What is the Law,https://www-bbc-com.translate.goog/news/uk-47158287?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=id&_x_tr_hl=id&_x_tr_pto=tc&_x_tr_hist=true.
Xavier Nugraha dkk, 2021, Analisis Potensi Legalisasi Euthanasia Di Indonesia: Diskursus Antara Hak Untuk Hidup Dengan Hak Menentukan Pilihan, University of Bengkulu Law Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1.
Zheng Yueqi, 2023, A Study Of The Legal Control Of Euthanasia In China, Jurnal Hukum, Sosial dan Humaniora, Vol. 1, No. 4.
Declaration of Human Rights
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Kode Etik Kedokteran Indonesia.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Most read articles by the same author(s)