Perlindungan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Bali Terhadap Klaim PT Karya Tangan Indah (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 823/K/Pid.Sus/2009)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Ketut Deni Aryasa was brought to the court as a defendant and was acquitted based on Denpasar District Court Decision Number: 341/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Dps and corroborated in the Supreme Court Decision Number 823 K/Pid.Sus/2009. The verdict is related to the criminal offense of copyright infringement, intentionally and without the right to do the act of publishing or reproducing a work. (Article 72 paragraph (1) of Law No. 19 Year 2002 on Copyright). This case not only involves the defendant, but also involves John Hardy Limited, PT Karya Tangan Indah, and Balinese silver craftsmen. The silversmiths were involved because they considered the object of the case to be their traditional cultural expression, and it was found that many other traditional cultural expressions had been registered by foreign parties. GRTKF was a hot topic at that time, even until now it is still an issue, and this case has also become a discussion at WIPO in its discussion about GRTKF. The object of this research is traditional cultural expressions and copyright (case study in Supreme Court Decision Number 823 K/Pid.Sus/2009). This decision illustrates that traditional cultural expressions are regulated in copyright and some related rules in Indonesia. However, the regulation related to traditional cultural expressions is still not effective. It can be said that traditional cultural expressions have not been maximally protected. Concerns arise over the utilization of traditional cultural expressions by foreign parties, but to the detriment of the communal community where the traditional cultural expressions originate.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.
References
Atmadja, Hendra Tanu. Perlindungan Hak Cipta Musik atau Lagu. Cetaka 2-Edisi Kedua. Jakarta:Hatta International, 2004.
Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual. Modul Kekayaan Intelektual Tingkat Dasar Bidang Hak Cipta. Jakarta,2020.
Forbes, Graeme. Attitude Problems; An Essay on Linguistic Intensionality. New York: Oxford University Press Inc. 2006.
Kesowo, Bambang. Pengantar Pemahaman konsepsi dasar sekitar hak atas kekayaan intelektual (HAKI). Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2021.
Levy, Michael I., editor. 100 Most Influential Philosophers All the Time. New York: Britannica Educational Publishing. 2010.
Manning, John F. Deriving Rules of Statutory Interpretation from the Constitution. vol. 7. Columbia: Columbia Law Review, 2001.
Sardjono, Agus. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Pengetahuan Tradisional: Suatu Telaah Teoritis, edisi ketiga. Depok: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia. 2021.
Sardjono, Agus. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Pengetahuan Tradisional: Suatu Telaah Teoritis, edisi ketiga. Bandung: PT Alumni. 2010.
Setiawan, Rahmat,. dan Firmansyah Fality. TENUN NAMBO: Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Penerbit NEM. 2020.
Stokes, Simon. Pasal and Copyright. Oregon:HPasal Publishing, 2001.
Susanti, R. Diah Imaningrum. Hak Moral dan Hak Ekonomi dalam Hukum Hak Cipta, Sejarah, Filosofi, dan Perbandingan. Malang: Widya Sasana Publication. 2016.
Ayu, Miranda Risang, Rika Ratna Permata, and Laina Rafianti. "Sistem Perlindungan Sumber Daya Budaya Tak Benda di Palembang, Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia." Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 29.2. 2017. 205-220.
Simarmata, Dorvinando Bonanta., and Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto. "Perlindungan Hukum Karakteristik Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta." Jurnal Privat Law 9.2. 2021.
Stoljar, Natalie. “Interpretation, Indeterminacy and Authority: Some Recent Controversies in the Philosophy of Law.” The Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 11, 2003.
Susanti, Diah Imaningrum. "Eksplorasi Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal Berbasis Hak Asasi Manusia." Media luris Vol. 5 No.3. Universitas Airlangga, Magister Ilmu Hukum, Oktober 2022.
Walshaw, Christopher. “Interpretation is Understanding and Application: The Case for Concurrent Legal Interpretation.” Statute Law Review, vol. 2, 2012.
Wróblewski, Jerzy. “Legal Language and Legal Interpretation.” Law and Philosophy, vol. 4, no. Legal Reasoning & Legal Interpretation, 1985.
Widyastuti, Istie. “Upaya Pencegahan Penggunaan Secara Melawan Hukum Pengetahuan Tradisional dan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional (PTekspresi budaya tradisional) Milik Indonesia oleh Pihak Asing”. Tesis, Universitas Indonesia, 2013.
Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar. Putusan Nomor: 341/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Dps
Mahkamah Agung. Putusan Nomor 823 K/Pid.Sus/2009
Undang-Undang tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan, UU Nomor 5 Tahun 2017. LL SETNEG : 31.
Undang-Undang tentang Hak Cipta, UU No. 28 Tahun 2014. LN.2014/No. 266, TLN No. 5599, LL SETNEG:57.
Undang-Undang tentang Hak Cipta, UU Nomor 19 Tahun 2002. LN.2OO2/No 85, TLN No. 4220.
KEPPRES RI No. 25 TAHUN 1989 Tentang Pengesahan Persetujuan Mengenai Perlindungan Hak Cipta Antara Republik Indonesia Dan Amerika Serikat
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) - Copyright.
Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia Tentang Data Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal. Permenkumham No. 13 tahun 2017. BN.2017/NO.964
Agusman, Damos Dumeli, “GRTKF THE CORE CONCEPTS AND OBJECTIVES WHAT THEY ARE AND WHY NEED PROTECTIONS INDONESIA’S PERSPECTIVE” (Powerpoint). Tersedia pada https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_iptk_bkk_09/wipo_iptk_bkk_09_topic1_1.pdf. Diakses pada Desember 2022.
Detik.com, “John Hardy Tak Pernah Klaim Motif Tradisional Bali”, dipublikasikan tanggal 12 September 2008. Tersedia pada https://news.detik.com/berita/d-1005217/john-hardy-tak-pernah-klaim-motif-tradisional-bali. Diakses pada Desember 2022.
Kompas.com, “Berebut Hasil Kreasi Perajin Perak Bali Halaman all - Kompas.com”, dipublikasikan tanggal 21 September 2008. Tersedia pada https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2008/09/21/0055258/berebut.hasil.kreasi.p-erajin.perak.bali?page=all, diakses pada Desember 2022.
Martinet, Lily., “Traditional Cultural Expressions and International Intellectual Property Law” dipubliskasikan pada 18 April 2019, terdapat pada https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-legal-information/article/traditional-cultural-expressions-and-international-intellectual-property-law/FB2753FCCB69B560BBBCA30CD221739C, diakses pada Desember 2023.
WIPO, “Glossary”, tersedia pada https://www.wipo.int/tk/en/resources/glossary.html#23, diakses pada Desember 2022.
WIPO, “Traditional Cultural Expressions”, tersedia pada https://www.wipo.int/tk/en/folklore/. Diakses pada Desember 2023.
website: www.transmediapustaka.com