Analysis of Judge's Consideration in Applying the Principles of Contract Law and Nebis in idem in the Examination of Civil Disputes Related to the Birth of an Agreement (Case Study of Case No. 969/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Tng. and No. 173/Pdt/2023/PT.BTN.)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to explore the considerations made by judges of the Banten High Court in resolving Civil Case Number 173/Pdt./2023/PN.BTN. concerning a dispute over the sale and purchase of land, which involves marital property and is linked to the principles of nebis in idem and the fundamental theory of contract formation. The methodology involves inventorying primary and secondary legal materials related to land law, followed by the identification of these materials according to the central issues of the research. Through analysis of these legal materials, the researcher seeks to provide insights and solutions to the questions raised. The findings revealed that the judges of the High Court of Banten affirmed the decision of the Tangerang District Court in Civil Dispute Number 173/Pdt./2023/ PT.BTN. They found that the reasons behind the initial decision were correct, especially regarding the land and building ownership issue involving Mr. Arhan. Hence, it is crucial for judges to thoroughly review all aspects of a case, particularly the subject matter, to ensure a fair and just outcome that benefits all parties involved.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.
References
Conway, G. (2003). Ne bis in idem and the international criminal tribunals. Crim. LF, 14, 351.
Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Edisi Revisi. Kencana Pranada.
Meliala, D. S. (2008). Penuntun praktis perjanjian pemberian kuasa menurut kitab undang-undang hukum perdata. Nuansa Aulia.
Mertokusumo, S. (2012). Teori hukum. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Mertokusumo, S., & Pitlo, A. (2009). Legal discovery. Liberty.
Muhammad, A. (2000). Hukum Perdata Indonesia. In Citra Aditya Bakti. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Nabilasari Lesmana, E., & Yustiawan, D. G. P. (2023). Civil Law Analysis of Unwritten Agreements in Business Activities. POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES, 2(2 SE-Articles), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v2i2.568
Safaat, M. A. (2015). Standarisasi Pendidikan Tinggi Hukum. Setara Press.
Soekanto, S. (2015). Pengantar penelitian hukum. Press UI.
Soeparmono, R. (2000). Hukum Acara Perdata dan Yurisprudensi. Mandar Maju.
Soepomo, I. (1995). Pengantar hukum perburuhan. Djambatan.
Subekti. (2011). Hukum Persetujuan. Intermasa.
Sutedi, A. (2006). Kekuatan Hukum Berlakunya Sertifikat Sebagai Tanda Bukti Hak Atas Tanah. Balai Pustaka Cipta Jaya.