Akta Pengakuan Utang Sebagai Pengganti Bukti Penyetoran Modal Dalam Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas

Main Article Content

Nadhira Faza Zharfani
Teddy Anggoro

Abstract

In practice, there are often disobedient shareholders who do not deposit the full capital that has been issued, even though their names as shareholders have been recorded in the Company's deed of establishment. In this research, the author raises the case of a Deed of Acknowledgement of Indebtedness made by a shareholder at PT This research will discuss the absence of capital deposits by shareholders in the establishment of a limited liability company which can be said to be a debt based on the applicable laws and regulations, as well as reviewing whether a Deed of Acknowledgement of Indebtedness can be used as a substitute for proof of capital deposits in the Company. This research was prepared using normative juridical research methods, utilizing document studies using secondary data, and using analytical descriptive research specifications, and analyzed using qualitative analysis methods. The research results show that the absence of a full deposit made by shareholders in the Company constitutes a debt and/or obligation and is considered fulfilled if the shareholder has made a full deposit into the Company. Apart from that, as reflected in Article 33 paragraph (2) of Law no. 40/2007, shareholders are required to deposit capital in full to the Company as proof of legal ownership of the issued shares. Thus, the Deed of Acknowledgment of Indebtedness made by the shareholder in the case raised serves as evidence of an Authentic Deed which strengthens and justifies the Company's position in postponing the granting of shareholder rights to shareholders who have not paid for the shares that have not been deposited. However, the existence of the Deed of Acknowledgment of Indebtedness cannot replace proof of capital deposit in the Company.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Zharfani, N. F., & Teddy Anggoro. (2024). Akta Pengakuan Utang Sebagai Pengganti Bukti Penyetoran Modal Dalam Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas. UNES Law Review, 6(3), 9200-9210. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1843
Section
Articles

References

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, [Burgerlijke Wetboek], diterjemahkan oleh R. Soebekti dan R. Tjitrosudibio.
Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.
Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.
Arrisman, Hukum Perikatan Perdata dan Hukum Perikatan Islam di Indonesia, Jakarta: Tampunjak Mustika Edukarya, 2020.
Ginting, Jamin, Hukum Perseroan Terbatas (Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.
Harahap, M. Yahya, Hukum Perseroan Terbatas, Edisi Kesatu, Cetakan Ketujuh, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.
Hartono, Sri Redjeki, Kapita Selekta Hukum Perusahaan, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2000.
Hend, Harry G., dan John R. Alexander, Law of Corporation, St Paul Minnesota: Wet Publish Co, 1983.
Khairandy, Ridwan, Perseroan Terbatas Doktrin: Peraturan Perundang-undangan dan Yurisprudensi, Yogyakarta: Total Media Yogyakarta, 2009.
Mashudi, H dan Chidir Ali, Pengertian-Pengertian Elementer Hukum Perjanjian Perdata, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2001.
Setiawan, R., Hukum Perikatan-Perikatan Pada Umumnya, Bandung: Bina Cipta, 1987.
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.
Subekti, Hukum Perjanjian, Cetakan Keduapuluhtiga, Jakarta: Intermasa, 2010.
Suratman dan Philips Dillah, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Bandung, Alfabeta, 2014.
Syahrani, Riduan, Seluk Beluk dan Asas-Asas Hukum Perdata, Bandung: Alumni, 2006.
Tobing, H.S. Lumban, Peraturan Jabatan Notaris, cet.4, Jakarta: Erlangga, 1996.
Wiratha, I Made, Pedoman Penulisan Usulan Penelitian Skripsi, dan tesis, Yogyakarta: Andi, 2006.
Dwilaksmi, Ni Made Ayu Pasek, “Akibat Hukum Pelanggaran Kewajiban Menggunakan Bahasa Indonesia dalam Perjanjian Dengan Pihak Asing,” Acta Comitas, Vol. 05, (2020).
Gultom, Hamonangan Justinus dan Erna Susilawaty Sebayang, “Aspek Hukum Akta Pengakuan Hutang Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Konsumtif”, Jurnal Ilmiah Skylandsea, Vol. 2, No. 1, (2018).
Mayra, Hoyrinissa dan Dian Puji N. Simatupang, “Akta Dinyatakan Batal Demi Hukum Oleh Pengadilan: Bagaimana Tanggungjawab Notaris?”, Jurnal Kertha Semaya, Vol. 10, No. 1 (2021), https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2021.v10.i01.p14.
Nata, Indra Jaya, “Kedudukan Hukum Pemegang Saham Yang Tidak Melakukan Penyetoran Modal Secara Penuh Atas Pembagian Dividen Dalam Perseroan Terbatas”, Privat Law, Vol. 11, No. 1, (2023).
Setiani, Rosyida dan Siti Nur Intihani, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Saham Yang Tidak Menyetor Modal Pada Perseroan Terbatas Dalam Perspektif Keadilan”, Jurnal Veritas, Vol. 10, No. 2, (2021), https://uia.e-journal.id/veritas/.