Kedudukan Perjanjian Kawin yang Dibuat Dihadapan Notaris Setelah Perkawinan
Main Article Content
Abstract
A Marriage Agreement is an agreement between a husband and wife regarding matters that will arise in marriage. A marriage agreement is usually made by the prospective husband and wife regarding aspects of the marriage and all matters that may arise during the marriage before the marriage takes place or when the marriage takes place. However, with the issuance of Constitutional Court decision no. 69/PUU XIII/2015 determines that a marriage agreement can be made before, during and during the marriage. This article wants to discuss marriage agreements after the Constitutional Court decision above comes into effect and the position of Marriage Agreements made before a Notary after the Constitutional Court Decision comes into force. The method used is a normative juridical approach and descriptive analytical research specifications. Qualitative juridical data analysis. Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 determines that marriage agreements can be made before, during and during the marriage, and there are several formats of model marriage agreements which can be a guide for notaries who will make marriage agreement deeds and agreement deeds. Marriages made before a Notary after the enactment of Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 are still valid and are authentic deeds and are valid evidence.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.
References
Atwood,Barbara A. and Bix, B. H. (2012). A New Uniform Law For Premartial and Marital Agreements. Family Law Quarterly, 46(3), 313.
Cooke, Elizabeth; Clarke, S. (2014). The Law Commisions Report on Matrimonial Property, Needs and Agremeents. Family Law Quarterly,
H. Suwignyo, “Keabsahan Cap Jempol sebagai Pengganti Tanda Tangan dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik.” Jurnal NOTARIUS, Vol. 1, No. 1, (2009), hlm. 74
Judiasih, S. D. (2017b). Quo Vadis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015 tentang Perjanjian Kawin. In Lokakarya Perjanjian Kawin Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015. Departemen Hukum Keperdataan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung.
Katz, S. N. (2003). Family Law in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ko Tjay Sing, Hukum Perdata Jilid I Hukum Keluarga (Diktat Lengkap), Seksi Perdata Barat Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 1981, hlm. 182
Li, L , Be Prepared in Advance: A Case For Allowing Binding Prenuptial Agreementd in Hongkong. International Journal of Law, Policy and The Family, 2014, hlm.340
M, A. (2004). Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, 2016
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana, 2010, hlm. 93.
Rony Hanitiyo Soemitro, Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Juri Metri, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1994, hlm. 5.
Ronny Hanitije Soemitro, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1988.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro,Hukum Perkawinan di Indonesia,Sumur Bandung, Bandung,1981, hlm. 7