Revolusi Digital dalam Peradilan Agama: Membuka Jalan bagi Keadilan yang Lebih Inklusif di Indonesia

Main Article Content

Amrar Mahfuzh Faza
Mukhlis Lubis


This research explores the transformation in Indonesia's religious courts triggered by the current development of digital technology. A particular focus is given to how digitization affects efficiency and access to justice, particularly in remote areas. Despite improvements in the application of technology, there remains a knowledge gap regarding the social impact and inclusiveness of digitization in religious justice practice. The methodology used was qualitative with an analytical descriptive approach focusing on the study of relevant literature to gain a comprehensive understanding. The results showed that digitization has improved the efficiency of the judicial process and facilitated effective and efficient access to legal information, however there are significant infrastructure and digital literacy challenges. The findings highlight that while digitization provides benefits in accelerating case handling, gaps in digital access and literacy are major barriers to its implementation. The implication is that there is a need for improved digital infrastructure and literacy, as well as training for stakeholders to effectively integrate digital technology in the religious justice system in Indonesia.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mahfuzh Faza, A., & Lubis, M. (2024). Revolusi Digital dalam Peradilan Agama: Membuka Jalan bagi Keadilan yang Lebih Inklusif di Indonesia. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 7278-7284.


Abubakar, A. (2021). Children handling procedure in islamic criminal offense in aceh. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 21(1), 111–140. Scopus.
Berkah, D., & Sawarjuwono, T. (2019). Inheritance wealth distribution model and its implication to economy. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(3), 1–10. Scopus.
Djamaludin, Aziz, M. F., Ar-Rasyid, Y., & As-Sayyis, I. A. (2023). Assessing the Impact of Electronic Court Systems on the Efficiency of Judicial Processes in the Era of Digital Transformation. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 6(1), 1–18. Scopus.
Farid, D., Abdulah Pakarti, M. H., & Fathiah, I. (2022). Interfaith Marriage: Subjectivity of the Judge in Determination of No. 454/pdt.p/2018 Surakarta District Court. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 7(2), 347–362. Scopus.
Hidayah, N. P., & Wicaksono, G. W. (2020). Legal Knowledge Management System on Family Law for Society. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 11(1), 68–85. Scopus.
Jaliansyah, M. P. N. (2021). Critical Review of Domestic Violence as Reason for Divorce (Comparison of Divorce Laws in Indonesia, Malaysia and the Maldives). Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial, 16(1), 1–23. Scopus.
Johnson, B. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (Fifth edition). Sage Publications.
Karjoko, L., Jaelani, A. K., Tegnan, H., Glaser, H., & Hayat, M. J. (2021). Islamic Court’s Approach to Land Dispute in Inheritance Cases. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 21(2), 213–238. Scopus.
Medvedeva, M., Vols, M., & Wieling, M. (2020). Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 28(2), 237–266. Scopus.
Nasution, H., & Muchtar, A. R. (2020). Access to Justice for Women and Children in Divorce Cases in the Indonesian Religious Courts. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 20(2), 361–384. Scopus.
Nawawi, M. A., Edi, R. N., & Setiawan, A. (2022). Harmonization of Islam and human rights: Judges’ legal arguments in rejecting child marriage dispensation in Sukadana, Indonesia. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan, 22(1), 117–133. Scopus.
Neo, J. L. (2018). Definitional imbroglios: A critique of the definition of religion and essential practice tests in religious freedom adjudication. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(2), 574–595. Scopus.
Padgett, D. (2017). Qualitative methods in social work research (Third edition). SAGE.
Pappas, I. O., & Woodside, A. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58. Scopus.
Putz, B., Menges, F., & Pernul, G. (2019). A secure and auditable logging infrastructure based on a permissioned blockchain. Computers and Security, 87. Scopus.
Ramadhan, S., & Muslimin, J. M. (2022). Indonesian Religious Court Decisions on Child Custody Cases: Between Positivism and Progressive Legal Thought. Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah, 21(1), 89–100. Scopus.
Sung, H.-C. (2020). Can Online Courts Promote Access to Justice? A Case Study of the Internet Courts in China. Computer Law and Security Review, 39. Scopus.
Suriyati, S. (2022). Judges’ Legal Culture in Dealing with High Number of Applications for Child Marriage Dispensation during Covid-19 Pandemic at the Kudus Religious Court. Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial, 17(1), 136–161. Scopus.
Wijayati, M., Abdullah, I., White, S., Rosadi, A., Yamin, A., & Larasati, Y. G. (2021). Justice brokers: Women’s experiences with injustice and dependence in the divorce process. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1). Scopus.