Penerapan Asas Keadilan dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Indonesia

Main Article Content

Danialsyah Danialsyah

Abstract

The goal of this study is to assist the community with case management. Settlement of civil disputes can be carried out through a process in court. The research method used is a descriptive qualitative research approach, namely research on natural objects from experiments. using observational data collection techniques, interviews. Research findings describing the application of Restorative Justice in Indonesia are still limited and face various challenges, such as lack of public understanding of the concept of Restorative Justice, limited resources, and lack of support and coordination between institutions. The findings contribute to an in-depth understanding of the opportunities and barriers for incorporating restorative justice approaches into the civil justice system in Indonesia. Recognition by the community and the judiciary. There are challenges in the implementation of restorative justice, such as the lack of trained human resources and adequate facilities, so improvements and developments are needed for restorative justice to be properly implemented.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Danialsyah, D. (2023). Penerapan Asas Keadilan dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Indonesia. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 5816-5825. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1356
Section
Articles

References

Adriyansah, Ade. (2018). Kedudukan Hukum Putusan No. 200/PDT. G/2008/PN. SMG Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepemilikan Tanah Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 3(1), 1–14. https://journals.usm.ac.id/index.php/jic/article/download/860/545
Agustina, Rosa. 2003, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia. https://onesearch.id/Record/IOS1.INLISM00000000004224?widget=1
Caiza Chacha, Franklin Orlando, & Sasig Silva, Erika Liliana. (2022). Desarrollo de una aplicación web y móvil de realidad aumentada para el museo de la Casa de los Marqueses de Miraflores de la ciudad de Latacunga. Ecuador: Latacunga: Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi (UTC). http://repositorio.utc.edu.ec/handle/27000/9751
Campbell, Henry Black, 1968, Black’sLaw Dictionary. St Paul: West Publishing Co. https://heimatundrecht.de/sites/default/files/dokumente/Black%27sLaw4th.pdf
European Judicial Enforcement. 2012, The European Small Claim Procedure in the Netherland, April 2012. https://www.europe-eje.eu/sites/default/files/pj/dossiers/nl_petit_litigeenglish.pdf
Fakhriah, Efa Laela. 2012, “Eksistensi Small Claims Court dalam Mewujudkan Tercapainya Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan”, Research Report Year 2012. https://pustaka.unpad.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Eksistensi-Small-Claim-Court.pdf
Fariana, Anita. 2015, “Penerapan Acara Singkat dan Acara Cepat Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan Suatu Tinjauan Politik Hukum Acara Perdata.” Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata (ADHAPER), vol. 2 (2015): 34. DOI: 10.36913/jhaper.v1i1.2
Fitria, Raissa Anita. (2017). Penyadapan Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Umum Berdasarkan Hukum Acara Pidana. Mimbar Keadilan, 160–182. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v0i0.2192
Hermanus, Widio Jeremi Ismail. (2022). TINJAUAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PEMECAH OMBAK DALAM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINGGI MANADO NOMOR: 9/PIDANA KHUSUS 2018 PT. MANADO. LEX ADMINISTRATUM, 10(1). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/38318
Iqbal, Muhamad. (2018). Implementasi Efektifitas Asas Oportunitas di Indonesia Dengan Landasan Kepentingan Umum. Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu: Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(1), 87– 100. Jakarta: Creative Media, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v9i1.1178
Kansil, Fernando I. (2014). Sanksi Pidana dalam Sistem Pemidanaan Menurut KUHP dan di Luar KUHP. Lex Crimen, 3(3). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/5296
Kurniawan. 2014, “Perbandingan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen di Indonesia dengan Negera-negara Common Law System” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 44th Year, No. 2, April-Juni 2014. DOI:10.21143/jhp.vol44.no2.23
Mamudji, Sri, et al., 2005, Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum. Depok: Badan Penerbit FHUI. https://onesearch.id/Record/IOS1.INLIS000000000153335?widget=1
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. 2006, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2006. https://simpus.mkri.id/opac/detail-opac?id=4438
Nurhayati, Siti, & Fadhillah, Muhammad Haris. (2022). Menakar Peluang Dan Tantangan Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Fintech Syariah Melalui Laps. Jurnal Tabarru’: Islamic Banking and Finance, 5(1), 63– 70. DOI:10.25299/jtb.2022.vol5(1).8857
O’Toole, John, Bagshaw, Dale, Burton, Bruce, Grünbaum, Anita, Lepp, Margret, Morrison, Morag, Pillai, Janet, O’Toole, John, Bagshaw, Dale, & Burton, Bruce. (2019). Conflict Management, Resolution and Transformation. Researching Conflict, Drama and Learning: The International DRACON Project, 13–42. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-13-5916-3
Ouellet, Marie, Hashimi, Sadaf, Gravel, Jason, & Papachristos, Andrew V. (2019). Network exposure and excessive use of force: Investigating the social transmission of police misconduct. Criminology & Public Policy, 18(3), 675–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12459
Pardede, Josua Navirio, & Santoso, Wahyu Yun. (n.d.). 2001, Refleksi Kritis Terhadap Konsep Keadilan Restoratif dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia. Perdata di Indonesia). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset. https://doi.org/10.38011/jhli.v8i2.390
Saleh, Muhammad, 2016, Penerapan Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan pada Eksekusi Putusan Perkara Perdata. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Graha Cendikia. http://perpustakaan.bldk.mahkamahagung.go.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=6907&keywords=
Salloch, Sabine, Vollmann, Jochen, & Schildmann, Jan. (2014). Ethics by opinion poll? The functions of attitudes research for normative deliberations in medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(9), 597– 602. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101253
Sarbini, Ilyas, & Ma’arij, Aman. (2020). Restorative Justice Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana. Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 9(1), 31–42. DOI:10.34304/fundamental.v1i1.19
Scholl, Mark B., & Townsend, Christopher B. (2023). Restorative justice: A humanistic paradigm for addressing the needs of victims, offenders, and communities. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling. https://doi.org/10.1002/johc.12204
Soekanto, Soerjono, 2012, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia. https://perpustakaan.mahkamahagung.go.id/slims/pn-jakartaselatan/index.php?p=show_detail&id=1802
Sukolegowo, Pramono, 2008, “Efektivitas Sistem Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana, Biaya Ringan di Lingkungan Peradilan Umum”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol.8 Nomor 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2008.8.1.22
Sunaryo, Sidik, 2005, Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Malang: UMM Press. https://onesearch.id/Record/IOS4317.laser-04008714
Suyono, Yoyok Ucuk. (2020). Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan diluar Peradilan Sebagai Upaya Pencapaian Rasa Keadilan. Jatiswara, 35(3). https://jatiswara.unram.ac.id/index.php/js/article/view/258
Winarso, Surakhmad, 1994, Metode dan Teknik dalam Bukunya, Pengantar Penelitian Ilmiah Dasar Metode Teknik. Bandung: Tarsito, 1994. https://inlislite.undiksha.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=2259
Yunus, Karaeng M. Marwa, & Hasan, K. N. Sofyan. (2023). Kebijakan Legislasi Mediasi Penal Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana di Bidang Perlindungan Konsumen. http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/lexl.v5i1.1855