Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Usaha yang Dirugikan Akibat Adanya Ulasan Negatif Fiktif Ditinjau dari Fatwa DSN MUI No 24 Tahun 2017 (Studi Kasus Pada Aplikasi Google Maps)

Main Article Content

Adelia Budiman Budiman
Iwan Iwan

Abstract

 This study examines the impact and legal protection provided to businesses facing fictitious negative reviews on the Google Maps application based on the guidelines recommended by the Fatwa DSN MUI No. 24 of 2017. The research aims to understand how fictitious negative reviews on the Google Maps application affect businesses and to evaluate the extent to which the fatwa has been implemented in protecting the rights and reputation of affected businesses. Additionally, it seeks to identify effective legal protection measures for businesses. The research utilizes a qualitative method with a case study approach, allowing for an in-depth understanding of real cases experienced by businesses suffering losses due to fictitious negative reviews on Google Maps. The research findings indicate that Fatwa DSN MUI No. 24 of 2017 plays a crucial role in providing legal protection guidelines for businesses affected by fictitious negative reviews. The impacts include decreased revenue, damaged reputation, and financial losses. Therefore, the study provides recommendations for protecting against fictitious negative reviews, including through legal approaches and reputation management. In conclusion, this fatwa holds significant relevance in legal protection and maintaining the reputation of businesses in the digital era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Budiman, A. B., & Iwan, I. (2023). Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Usaha yang Dirugikan Akibat Adanya Ulasan Negatif Fiktif Ditinjau dari Fatwa DSN MUI No 24 Tahun 2017 (Studi Kasus Pada Aplikasi Google Maps). UNES Law Review, 6(2), 5263-5273. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1353
Section
Articles

References

BUKU
Budiman, Arif. 2002. Corporate Social Responsibility, Jawaban bagi Model Pembangunan Indonesia Masa Kini. Jakarta: ICSD
Kahf, Monzer. 1995. Ekonomi Islam. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Kansil, C.S.T. 1989. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta : Balai Pustaka.
Nurudin. 2017. Perkembangan Teknologi Komunikasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Sinamora, Bilson. 2009. Panduan Perilaku Konsumen. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Syaltut, Mahmud. 1966. Al-Islam ‘Aqidah wa Syari’ah. Mesir: Dar Al-Qalam
Widjaja, Gunawan dan Ahmad Yani. 2003. Hukum tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta: Gramedia
JURNAL
Akdim, K. (2021). The influence of eWOM. Analyzing its characteristics and consequences, and future research linesLa influencia de eWOM. Analizando sus caracteristicas, consecuencas y futuras lineas de investigación. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 25(2), 239–259.
Ardhya, S. N. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Bentuk Kerugian Terhadap Konsumen Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PT. PLN Indonesia) (Studi Kasus Pemadaman Serentak Pada Beberapa Daerah di Indonesia). Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha Vo. 8 No.2.
Azimi, S., Chan, K., & Krasnikov, A. (2022). How fakes make it through : the role of review features versus consumer characteristics. 5(March), 523–537.
Citra, Made Emy Andayani, dkk. 2023. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Usaha Dalam Transaksi Elektronik (E-Commerce) Atas Penilaian Buruk Konsumen Yang Ditimbulkan Dari Kesalahan Konsumen Sendiri. Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS), Volume 05 Nomor (01)
Filieri, R., Alguezaui, S., & McLeay, F. (2015). Why do travelers trust TripAdvisor? Antecedents of trust towards consumer-generated media and its influence on recommendation adoption and word of mouth. Tourism Management, 51, 174–185.
Mayzlin, D., Dover, Y., & Chevalier, J. (2014). Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2421–2455.
Meijerink, J., & Schoenmakers, E. (2020). Why are online reviews in the sharing economy skewed toward positive ratings? Linking customer perceptions of service quality to leaving a review of an Airbnb stay. Journal of Tourism Futures, 7(1), 5–19.
Li, H., Meng, F., & Pan, B. (2020). How does review disconfirmation influence customer online review behavior? A mixed-method investigation. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(11), 3685–3703.
Schoenmueller, V., Netzer, O., & Stahl, F. (2020). The Polarity of Online Reviews: Prevalence, Drivers and Implications. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(5), 853–877.
Sugesti, Chory Ayu, dkk. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Usaha Online Shop Yang Mengalami Kerugian Yang Disebabkan Oleh Konsumen Di Kota Singaraja. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. Volume 3 No 3
Wu, Y., Ngai, E. W. T., Wu, P., & Wu, C. (2020). Fake online reviews: Literature review, synthesis, and directions for future research. Decision Support Systems, 132(March), 113280.
Zhuang, M., Cui, G., & Peng, L. (2018). Manufactured opinions: The effect of manipulating online product reviews. Journal of Business Research, 87(February), 24–35.

WEBSITE
Fastcompany (2021) https://www.fastcompany.com/90650386/why-its-so-hard-to-get-rid-of-fake-online-reviews
Jfitzgeralsgroup (2022) https://jfitzgeraldgroup.com/fake-online-reviews/
Pinakunary, Fredrik J. (2004). Penerapan Tanggung Jawab Pidana Mutlak Pada Perkara Pencemaran Lingkungan. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/konsep-dan-praktik-strict-liability-di-indonesia-lt4d089548aabe8/. Diakses pada 3 November 2023

PERUNDANG - UNDANGAN
Fatwa DSN MUI No 24 Tahun 2017 Tentang Hukum Dan Pedoman Bermuamalah Melalui Media Sosial
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang ITE (Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik)
Undang-Undang Nom or 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen