Analysis of the Ideal Concept of Corporate Responsibility in Environmental Crimes

Main Article Content

Hyronimus Rhiti

Abstract

The problem with law enforcement for environmental crimes is that in prosecuting perpetrators of environmental crimes, the emphasis is still on the element of error. The implication of this problem is that it is difficult to prove environmental crimes, considering that the perpetrators of environmental crimes are not only people (natuurlijk person) but also include corporations (recht person). Legislation regarding the environment, especially Law Number 32 of 2009, has determined responsibility for perpetrators of environmental crimes using the strict liability theory. This article will discuss the implementation of strict liability theory to find the ideal concept for dealing with environmental crime. The method used in writing this article is normative legal research with a statutory approach. The results of this research are the ideal concept of corporate responsibility for the occurrence of environmental crimes in the form of payment of compensation (civil) and punishment of perpetrators (criminal sanction).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rhiti, H. (2023). Analysis of the Ideal Concept of Corporate Responsibility in Environmental Crimes. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 5366-5370. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1282
Section
Articles

References

Akbar Kusuma Hadi, N. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia Dilihat Dari Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 10(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.20961/Hpe.V10i2.62834
Ariyanti, V. (2019). Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis, 6(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.35586/Jyur.V6i2.789
Badilla, N. W. Y., & Rado, R. H. (2019). Harmonisasi Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Hukum Lingkungan Hidup Dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Lingkungan Indonesia. Jurnal Restorative Justice, 3(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.35724/Jrj.V3i1.1936
Bagus, C., Praja, E., Nurjaman, D., Fatimah, D. A., & Himawati, N. (2016). Strict Liability Sebagai Instrumen Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan. Varia Justicia, 12(1).
Erliyani, R. (2017). The Essence Of Primum Remedium Principle In The Enforcement Of Environmental Criminal Law. Journal Of Law, Policy And Globalization, 64.
Fitriya Wardhany, N. E. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Kebakaran Hutan Yang Menyebabkan Kerusakan Lingkungan. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 14(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.33087/Legalitas.V14i1.326
Manurung, R. D. P., & Santosa, A. B. (2019). Akar Yang Menjalar: Peran Emil Salim Dalam Kementerian Pengawasan Pembangunan Dan Lingkungan Hidup Di Indonesia 1972-1983. Factum: Jurnal Sejarah Dan Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.17509/Factum.V8i2.22150
Nanlohy, D. (2022). Pembangunan Dan Lingkungan Hidup : Dilema Etis Manusia. Tangkoleh Putai, 18(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.37196/Tp.V18i2.132
Pawestri, A. Y. (2019). Cita Hukum Dan Demokrasi Dalam Sistem Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia. Fairness And Justice: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 17(2).
Rochmani, Safik Faozi, W. M. (2019). Asas Pidana Primium Remidium Dalam Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Hidup. Prosiding Sendu_U_2019, 21(1).
Simalango, H. M., Tajudin, T., & Imamulhadi, I. (2021). Reorientasi Pengaturan Pendekatan Multidoor System Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup Pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Belo, 6(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.30598/Belovol6issue2page232-255
Siregar, T. M. N., & Junius Fernando, Z. (2021). Strict Liability Yang Tersembunyi : Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kejahatan Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi, 2(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.51370/Jhpk.V2i2.44
Susila Wibawa, K. C. (2019). Mengembangkan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Perlindungan Dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Untuk Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Administrative Law And Governance Journal, 2(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.14710/Alj.V2i1.79-92