Komparasi Lembaga Pengawas Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia dan Jepang
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Efficiency between authority and the burden of duties and responsibilities in improving consumer protection needs to be continuously updated both in terms of regulations and institutions. As a comparison country, Japan is considered the right country to make comparisons, especially in the field of supervision of the financial services sector, where Japan as a developed country has experienced many regulatory and institutional transformations, so this discussion is futuristic in nature. Japan itself had new consumer protection regulations in 1994, while consumer protection regulations in Indonesia are regulated in Law No. 8 of 1999. This research is normative juridical research with a computational approach and a statutory-regulatory approach. The results of this research show specific consumer protection in the financial services sector, both have almost the same instruments and institutions, OJK (Financial Services Authority) and BI (Bank Indonesia) in Indonesia, while in Japan there is the Financial Services Agency (OJK) and the Central Bank . Japan (BOJ), the difference is that the supervision process is carried out (on-site inspection), whereas in Indonesia it is still based on coordination based on the authority of each institution.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.
References
Ahmad Fauzi &Asril Sitompul.(2020).Transplantasi Hukum dan Permasalahan dalam Penerapan di Indonesia. Medan : CV. Pustaka Prima.
Bambang Murdadi.(2012). Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Pengawas Lembaga Keuangan Baru yang Memiliki Kewenangan Penyidikan.Value Added Vol 8 Nomor 2. Majalah Ekonomi dan Bisnis.
Christian Forster.(2009). From Information Overflow to Incapacitation: Comparing German and Japanese Consumer Protection Nr/No 27/2009.
Cheng, M., Edwards, D., Darcy, S., & Redfern, K. (2018). A Tri-Metod Approach to a Review of Adventure Tourism Literature: Bibliometric Analysis, Content Analysis, and a Quantitative Systematic Literature Review, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research. https;//doi.org/10.1177/1096348016640588.
Davis, D. (2005). Urban consumer culture. The China Quarterly 183.
H.P.J Buermans.(2014). Next Generation Sequencing Technology: Advances and Applications, Volume 1842, Nomor 10.
Irwansyah. (2021). Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media.
J. Schumpeter. (2011). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Harvard University Press.
Leslie Sherida Ferraz. (2008). Small Claims Courts and Qualifi ed access to justice, an empirical research. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Fundacko Getulio Vargas Law School.
Masahiko Aoiki, Hugh Patrick, The Japanese Main Bank System: Its Relevance for Developing and Transforming Economies, Oxford University Press.
Mochtar Kusumaatdmadja. (2002). Konsep-Konsep Hukum dalam Pembangunan. Bandung: PT. Alumni.
Mochtar Kusumaatdmaja. (2012). Teori Hukum Pembangunan. Jakarta : Epistema Institute dan Huma.
Noda, Y. and Angelo, A.H. (1976). Introduction to Japanese Law. Tokyo, Forest Grive, OR: University of Tokyo Press
Olivier. Examining the Social Acceptance of Genetically Modified Bionergy in Germany: Labels, Information Valence, Corporate Actors, and Consumer Decisions, Energy Research & Social Science, Volume 60 Nomo 101308.
Omura. (1998). Shohishaho [Consumer Law], Tokyo: Yuhikaku.
Patricia L Maclachlan, The Evolution of Consumer Protection in Postwar Japan. New York: University Bobst Library Techincal Service.
Pendapat Moh Koesno, dalam Syprianus Aristeus.( 2018). Transplantasi Hukum Bisnis di Era Globalisasi Tantangan Bagi Indonesia, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, Vol 18, Nomor 4.
Purwoto S. Gandasubrata. (2005). Asas-Asas Hukurn Eksekusi, suatu makalah.
Salim dan Erlies Septiana. (2014). Perbandingan Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Satjipto Rahardjo. (1991) Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Sejarah Lahirnya Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, https://www.academia.edu/18380101/SEJARAH_LAHIRNYA_HUKUM_PERLINDUNGAN_KONSUMEN#:~:text=Awal%20terbentuknya%20Undang%2DUndang%20No,No.%2042%20Tahun%201999).
Sudikno Mertokusumo. (2019). Teori Hukum. Yogyakarta: Maha Karya Pustaka.
Takeo Hoshi. (2004). Financial Regulation in Japan: A Sixth Year Review of The Financial Services Agency, Journal of Financial Stability, Volume 1 Nomor 2.
Wim Rogmans. Consumer Safety Protection in Japan. International Journal for Consumer.
Consumer Affairs Agency, Creating System and Environment for Consumer Activities, https://www.caa.go.jp/en/about_us/booklet/pdf/02booklet2019_en.pdf
https://www.ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/publikasi/Pages/Survei-Nasional-Literasi-dan-Inklusi-Keuangan-2019.aspx
https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/finserv.htm
Kim Kihwan, The 1997-98 Korean Financial Crisis: Causes, Policy Response, and Lessons, 2006, hal.7-9 (http://www.perjacobsson.org/external/np/seminars/eng/2006/cpem/pdf/kihwan.pdf, diakses 21 Juli 2012)