Upaya Hukum yang Dilakukan Korban Kejahatan Dikaji dari Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The state, via the Institute for the Protection of Witnesses and Victims (LPSK), leads the way in addressing crime victim compensation as a means of fulfilling state obligations and securing the welfare of the populace. LPSK stands for the Witness and Victim Protection Agency, an organization mandated with safeguarding the rights and safety of witnesses and/or victims. In accordance with the Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Witness and Victim Protection, LPSK guarantees equal legal certainty. Compensation is regulated in Law Number 13 of 2006 jo. Article 28D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution emphasizes that "Everyone has the right to recognition, guarantees, protection, fair legal certainty, and equal treatment before the law." Law Number 31 of 2014, PERMA (Chief Regulation) Number 1 of 2022, Government Regulation (PP) Number 8 of 2014, and PP Number 7 of 2018 are designed to provide state protection for the rights of crime victims in the UK. However, it's important to note that compensation is only available in certain cases. Additionally, the form of non-monetary compensation guaranteed by state regulation doesn't have a clear monetary value. Providing compensation to victims is a challenging task due to the lack of clarity concerning the form and scope of compensation. This will aid in ensuring that crime victims obtain certainty in their compensation rights. The state has a responsibility to revise or create regulations related to the implementation of non-monetary compensation to overcome the obstacles in resolving compensation issues. This is a study involving descriptive-analytical methods in normative legal research. The findings reveal a regulatory gap that exists in the explanation of non-monetary compensation in compensation payments. This gap creates complexity and uncertainty for the victims. The LPSK, an institution of the state, should establish a standard value as a benchmark to guarantee that victims receive proper compensation. However, compensation is not always in monetary form. The state, through LPSK, is obliged to provide compensation to protect victims' rights. To ensure consistency in payment and guarantee the protection of crime victims' rights beyond statutory classification, the government must adhere to assessments presented in various journals.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.
References
Rape Victims). Semarang: Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.
https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jkh/article/download/5006/3774
Arief, B. N. (2015). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Criminal Law Policies). Semarang: Materi Kuliah S-3 Ilmu Hukum UNDIP.
https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i1.23358
Badan Pusat Statistik (Indonesia Statistics). (2020). Statistik Kriminal 2020 (2020 Criminal Statistics). Jakarta: BPS RI. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2020/11/17/0f2dfc46761281f68f11afb1/statistikkriminal-2020.html
Cristiari, I. G. A., & Utari, A. S. (2014). Bentuk Ganti Kerugian Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan ditinjau dari Perspektif Viktimologi (Forms of Compensation to Rape Crime Victims from the
Victimological Perspective). Jurnal USDI, 3(1), 2.
https://erepo.unud.ac.id/id/eprint/8234/
Dimyati, K., Nashir, H., Elviandri, E., Absori, A., Wardiono, K., & Budiono, A. (2021). Indonesia as a legal welfare state: A prophetic-transcendental basis. Heliyon, 7(8), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07865
Goldscheid, Julie. (2004). 'Crime Victim Compensation in a Post-9/11 World.' 167 Tulane Law Review. Hakim, Lukman. (2020). Analysis of the Ineffectiveness of Restitution Procedure for Victims of HumanTrafficking. Journal of Scientific Studies, 20, 43-58. DOI: 10.31599/jki.v20i1.69.
Handrawan. (2010). Persetubuhan Menurut Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Adat Taloki (Intercourse According to the Criminal Law and the Taloki Customary Law). Universitas Airlangga.
https://all.fh.unair.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=19124&keywords=
Haswandi. (2017). Pengembalian Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pelaku Dan Ahli Warisnya Menurut Sistem Hukum Indonesia (Returning the Assets of Perpetrators and Heirs of Corruption Criminal Action According to the
Indonesian Legal System). Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 6(1), 169–170.
http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.6.1.2017.145-172
Husna, L. A. (2021). Legal Protection of Wife as a Victim of Sexual Violence from Positive Law and Human Rights Perspective. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, International Conference on
Community Empowerment and Engagement (ICCEE 2021), 661.
10.2991/assehr.k.220501.018
Iksan, M., Dimyati, K., Supanto, F., Surbakti, N., Absori, A., Nugroho, S. S., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2022). Legal Policy Fulfillment of Child Rape Victims’ Mental Health Rights. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 10(E), 126–129.
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.8144
Iksan, Muchamad. (2011). Kebijakan Legislatif tentang Perlindungan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Legislative Policies on the Protection in the Criminal Court System). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 14(2), 316–334.
https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/handle/11617/4194
Katsoris, Nicholas C. (1990). 'The European Convention on the Compensation of Victims of Violent Crimes: A Decade of Frustration.' Fordham International Law Journal.
https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj/vol14/iss1/9/
Komariah, Mamay. (2015). Legal Protection of Witnesses and Victims by the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK). Journal of Galuh Justisi, 3, 229. DOI: 10.25157/jigj.v3i2.421.
Latif, Abdul. (2007). The Function of the Constitutional Court in Realizing a Democratic Rule of Law. Yogyakarta: Total Media.
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i1.257
Lubis, T. M. (2016). Hukuman Mati dan Tantangan ke Depan: Suatu Studi Kasus tentang Indonesia. In R. Robet & T. M. Lubis (Eds.), Politik Hukuman Mati di Indonesia. South Tangerang: Marjin Kiri.
http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/ham.2019.10.127-144
Marasabessy, Fauzy. (2015). Restitution for Crime Victims: A Proposal for a New Mechanism. Journal of Law and Development, 45(1), January-March 2015.
https://ijospl.org/index.php/ijospl/article/download/135/95
Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Introduction to Legal Studies). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
https://onesearch.id/Record/IOS13475.INLIS000000000005724?widget=1
Mégret, Frédéric. (2010). 'Justifying Compensation By The International Criminal Court's Victims Trust Fund: Lessons From Domestic Compensation Schemes.' 36 Brooklyn Journal of International Law.
https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol36/iss1/3/
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. (1993). Chapters on Legal Discovery. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
https://onesearch.id/Author/Home?author=Mertokusumo%2C+Sudikno
Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (1984). Pidana dan Pemidanaan (Criminal Law and Sanctioning). Semarang: Badan Penyedia Bahan Kuliah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.
https://simpus.mkri.id/opac/detail-opac?id=7941
Ningsih, S. T. (2014). Pemberian Ganti Rugi oleh Pelaku Kepada Korban Kejahatan Harta Benda menurut KUHAP (The Giving of Compensation by Perpetrators to Wealth Victims According to the Criminal Procedural
Code). Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 10(2), 50.
https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/109677-ID-pemberian-ganti-rugi-oleh-pelaku-kepada.pdf
Nugroho. A.W. (2015). Penggalian Putusan Hakim: Penerapan Unsur Memperkaya Dan/Atau Menguntungkan Dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Putusan Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Examining Judge's Decisions: Application of Enriching and/or Beneficial Elements in Corruption Laws Associated with Decisions on Corruption Crimes). Jurnal Jurisprudence UMS. 5(1). 15-24
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Penggalian-Putusan-Hakim%3A-Penerapan-Unsur-Dan-Atau-Nugroho/5fdf04a48b8ccc8acfc961178995e8c62f8f089d
Tanya, B. L. (2013). Filsafat Hukum (Legal Philosophy). Surakarta: Bahan Kuliah Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum UMS. The Republic of Indonesia’s Supreme Court. (n.d.). Supreme Court Decision. Retrieved February 10, 2018, from
Putusan Mahkamah Agung website: https://putusan.mahkamahagung.go.id/putusan/downloadpdf/.../pdf.
Widnyana, I. M. (2013). Hukum Pidana Adat dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana (Customary Criminal Law in the Renewal of the Criminal Law). Jakarta: PT. Fikahati Aneska.
https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/377666-none-7ca6feaa.pdf
Wulandari, C. (2020). Dinamika Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia (Dynamics of Restorative Justice in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia). Jurnal Jurisprudence UMS. 10(2). 233-249
DOI:10.23917/jurisprudence.v10i2.12233
Yulia, Rena. (2010). Victimology: Legal Protection for Crime Victims. First Edition. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.