Main Article Content
Current economic developments have an impact on the public's lack of trust in their court institutions, where these court institutions are considered unprofessional, and not independent and even the moral integrity of judges in carrying out their profession has become blurred. Therefore, economic actors who really value time prefer alternative dispute resolution forums outside the court forum to resolve their business disputes which only require a short time and are in line with their business spirit. One of the alternative dispute resolution forums that is widely chosen and most popular among business people is arbitration. Decisions issued by this arbitration body are final and binding, but these decisions can be canceled and rejected as regulated in the 1958 New York Convention and implemented by Indonesia with Law No. 30 of 1999. Therefore, in this research, researchers will analyze how to regulate the annulment and rejection of arbitration decisions based on the two provisions mentioned above. To answer the questions in this research, the author uses normative juridical research methods. The research process will explore data in the form of legal provisions that have been written and are still in effect, as well as forms of information that have been published and the results of the analysis are described using qualitative methods, namely data acquisition methods, data organization. , sorting them into manageable units, synthesizing them, looking for and finding patterns, finding out what is important and what is learned, and deciding what can be used to answer the problem. From this research, the answer was found to be that both the 1958 New York Convention and Law No. 30 of 1999 do not concretely regulate the annulment of arbitration awards, but both regulations allow for the annulment of arbitration awards if they fulfill the requirements. Regarding the rejection of arbitration decisions, it is regulated concretely in article V of the 1958 New York Convention, as well as Law No. 30 of 1999, which also regulates concretely in article 66 letter c.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.
Eman Suparman, “Pilihan Forum Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Komersial Untuk Penegakkan Keadilan”; Disertasi, UNDIP, Semarang, 2004 (Mengutip tulisannya Adi Sulistiyono, “Mengembangkan Paradigma Penyelesaian Sengketa Non Litigasi Dalam Rangka Pendayagunaan Alternatif Penyelesaiaan sengketa Bisnis / Hak Kekayaan Intelektual; Disertasi, Semarang, PDIH, 2002)
Gatot Soemartono, “Arbitrase dan Mediasi di Indonesia “, PT Gramedia Pustaka Indonesia, Jakarta, 2006
Eman Suparman, “Perkembangan Doktrin Penyelesaian Sengketa di Indonesia “, hlm 2, (tulisan ini di up date dari www.hukumonline.com tanggal 20 Januari 2009)
Indah Lisa Diana, “Ketertiban Umum Sebagai Dasar Penolakan Dilaksanakannya Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Di Indonesia, “hlm 7 (di up date di www.pemantauperdilan.com tanggal 20 Jnuari 2009)
Konvensi New York 1958
Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999