Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penjualan Tanah pada Pihak Penjual Sedang dalam Masa Tahanan
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the skills of the seller who is currently in detention in making a sale and purchase deed, the validity of the sale and purchase deed if the provisions of Article 22 of Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 concerning Position Regulations for Land Deed Making Officials in the form of reading the deed are not fulfilled and how it is implemented Article 22 Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 concerning the Position Regulations for Land Deed Officials in the field. This study uses empirical juridical legal research methods, which examines the applicable legal provisions and what actually happens in society. The results of the study show that the seller who is currently in detention is legally competent to make a Sale and Purchase Deed as long as he is an adult and not under the supervision of another person. A sale and purchase deed is valid as long as it complies with Article 1320 of the Civil Code, although it does not comply with the provisions of Article 22 of Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 concerning Position Regulations for Officials Making Land Deeds in the form of not being read out first by the PPAT before being signed by the parties. Implementation of Article 22 of Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 concerning Position Regulations for Officials for Making Land Deeds in the form of reading the deed before signing can be done through a Power of Attorney or direct signing to the Penitentiary. Thus, even though one of the parties is currently under detention in this case the seller, the provisions of Article 22 PP Number 37 of 1998 concerning PPAT Position Regulations will still be fulfilled, not eliminating or violating the provisions of Article 22 PP Number 37 of 1998 concerning Regulations for the Position of Making Officials Land certificate.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.
References
Efendi, J. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif da Empiris. Jakarta: Preradamedia Grup.
Hidayat Putri, Z. F. D. (2021). Penyuluhan Hukum Masyarakat tentang Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli. Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum, 1(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.22219/jdh.v1i2.17356
Legawantara, M. E. K., Arini, D. G. D., & Suryani, L. P. (2020). Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Jual Beli Hak Atas Tanah. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 1(1), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.1.1.2196.112-117
Meliala, A. Q. (1985). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatan Beserta Perkembangannya. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Mertokusuma, S. (2009). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
S., S. H. (2004). Hukum Kontrak: Teori & Teknik Penyusunan Kontrak. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Setiawan, I. K. (2020). Hukum Perikatan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Soekanto, S. (2004). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. jakarta: UI Press.
Subekti, R. (2003). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa.
Wirahutama, D. (2018). Kecakapan Hukum dan Legalitas Tanda Tangan Seorang Terpidana dalam Menandatangani Akta Otentik. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 120-121.
Zakiyah. (2015). Hukum Perjanjian Teori dan Perkembangannya. Yogyakarta: Lentera Kreasindo.