Subjek Hukum Investasi Internasional dalam Forum ICSID: Teori dan Praktiknya
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is essential in a globally integrated economic system when the host country needs the resources necessary for the development of its country's economy. However, differences in nationality make foreign investors vulnerable to host country government interference in their businesses. The inability of investors to participate in the democratic process in host countries makes International Investment Agreements (IIAs) and Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) important as a basis for providing substantive protection for investors. ICSID is a forum often referred to by investors in defending their rights and fulfilling their interests, as well as providing a dispute resolution system that allows every foreign investor to file a lawsuit against the host state government as the ICSID Convention regulates this. The results of the analysis show that the interpretation of subjects that can be disputed in ICSID can refer to Article 25(1) of the ICSID Convention. However, in practice, differences in tribunal interpretation in deciding which party can proceed and fulfill the dispute resolution criteria in the ICSID forum differ in several cases. In the case of East Kalimantan Regional Government vs PT Kaltim Prima Coal, the tribunal decided that the East Kalimantan Regional Government had stepped into the shoes of the State based on Article 25 (3) of the ICSID Convention. On the other hand, the acceptance of the Oleovest lawsuit by ICSID shows that non-state legal entities, in this context, multinational corporations, have the legitimacy to become parties to international investment disputes in several dispute resolution forums, such as ICSID, as long as there is relevance or relationship between the plaintiff and the BIT which is the basis of the activity. foreign investment or foreign investment in the host country.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa UNES Law Review berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Jurnal UNES Law Review.
References
dan Hukum Internasional. Depok: BPSDM KUMHAM Press.
Anwar, A. A. (2020, Oktober ). Penanganan Gugatan Arbitrase Internasional Terhadap Pemerintah Indonesia”. Modul Best Practice. Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia.
Bernasconi-osterwalder. (2020, March). Terminating a Bilateral Investment Treaty.
International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Bjorklund, A. K. (2018). The Legitimacy of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, Legitimacy and International Courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blythe, S. (2013). The Advantages of Investor-State Arbitation as a Dispute Resolution Mechanism in Bilateral Investment Treaties. International Lawyer , 47(2), 273.
Jened, R. (2016). Teori dan Kebijakan Hukum Investasi Langsung (Direct Investment). Jakarta: Kencana .
Kawharu, L. N. (2018). The curious case of ISDS arbitration involving Australia and New Zealand. University of Western Australia Law Review, 44(2), 32-70.
Mohan, M. (2017). Singapore and Its Free Trade Agreement with the European Union: Rationality Unbound. Journal of World Investment & Trade, 18(5-6), 858-889.
Ofodile, U. E. (2014). Managing Foreign Investment in Agricultural Land in Africa: The Role of Bilateral Investment Treaties and International Investment Contracts. Law and Development Review, 7(2), 329-368.
Peter Quayle and Xuan Gao, e. (2019). International Organizations and the Promotion of Effective Dispute Resolution . International Organizations and the Promotion of Effective Dispute Resolution.
Ranchorda, A. K. (2016). Snoozing Democracy: Sunset Clauses, De-Juridification, and Emergencies. Minnesota Journal of International Law, 25(1), 29-78.
Rihwanto, Y. (2016). Bilateral Investment Treaties Dan Penyelesaian Arbritase Internasional (Studi Kasus Pencabutan Izin Kuasa Pertambangan Churchill Mining). Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 1(1).
Rogers, C. A. (2013). The Politics of International Investment Arbitrators. Santa Clara Journal of International Law, 12(1).
Salviana, F. M. (2018, September). Kepastian Hukum Penerapan Bilateral Investment Treaty dalam Pelaksanaan Investasi di Indonesia. Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan PERSPEKTIF , 23(3).
Setiady, T. (2018). Peranan Arbitrase ICSID Dalam Kerangka Penanaman Modal Di Indonesia.
Yustitia, 4(2).
Shaheeza Lalani, a. R. (2015). The role of the state in investor-state arbitration. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Sooraj, S. a. (2013). Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism: The Quest for a Workable Roadmap. Utrech Jurnal of International and European Law, 29(76).
Walangare, J. M. (2016, April-Juni). Penyelesaian Sengketa Tentang Penanaman Modal dalam Negeri MeneurutUndangUndnagNomor 25 Tahun 2007. Lex Crimen, V(4).
Wittich,S. (2017). International Investment Law. The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law 12(2)
International Centre For Settlement Of Investment Disputes, Government Of The Province Of East Kalimantan V. Pt Kaltim Prima Coal Rio Tinto Plc Bp P.L.C. Pacific Resources Investments Limited Bp International Limited Sangatta Holdings Limited Kalimantan Coal Limited (2009)
Paragraf 183 Government of the Province of East Kalimantan v. PT Kaltim Prima Coal and others (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/3)